Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34883241›Full record

ReviewMolecular and cellular neurosciences2022

Animal models of hidden hearing loss: Does auditory-nerve-fiber loss cause real-world listening difficulties?

Kenneth S Henry

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular and cellular neurosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Age-Related Deficits in Binaural Hearing: Contribution of Peripheral and Central Effects.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Noise-induced hearing disorders: Clinical and investigational tools.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kenneth S HenryDepartments of Otolaryngology, Biomedical Engineering, and Neuroscience, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA. Electronic address: kenneth_henry@urmc.rochester.edu.
University of Rochester · US

Funding

Behavioral and physiological consequences of auditory nerve lossR01DC017519 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Kenneth Stuart Henry · 2019 to 2026
$3.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Afferent innervation of the cochlea by the auditory nerve declines during aging and potentially after sound overexposure, producing the common pathology known as cochlear synaptopathy. Auditory-nerve-fiber loss is difficult to detect with the clinical audiogram and has been proposed to cause 'hidden hearing loss' including impaired speech-in-noise perception. While evidence that auditory-nerve-fiber loss causes hidden hearing loss in humans is controversial, behavioral animal models hold promise to rigorously test this hypothesis because neural lesions can be induced and histologically validated. Here, we review recent animal behavioral studies on the impact of auditory-nerve-fiber loss on perception in a range of species. We first consider studies of tinnitus and hyperacusis inferred from acoustic startle reflexes, followed by a review of operant-conditioning studies of the audiogram, temporal integration for tones of varying duration, temporal resolution of gaps in noise, and tone-in-noise detection. Studies quantifying the audiogram show that tone-in-quiet sensitivity is unaffected by auditory-nerve-fiber loss unless neural lesions exceed 80%, at which point large deficits are possible. Changes in other aspects of perception, which were typically investigated for moderate-to-severe auditory-nerve-fiber loss of 50-70%, appear heterogeneous across studies and might be small compared to impairment caused by hair-cell pathologies. Future studies should pursue recent findings that behavioral sensitivity to brief tones and silent gaps in noise may be particularly vulnerable to auditory-nerve-fiber loss. Furthermore, aspects of auditory perception linked to central inhibition and fine neural response timing, such as modulation masking release and spatial hearing, may be productive directions for further animal behavioral research.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemHearing LossAnimalsAuditory PerceptionAuditory ThresholdCochlear NerveModels, AnimalAnimal behaviorCentral gainCochlear synaptopathyInner hair cellOperant conditioningTinnitus

Identifiers

PMID34883241
PMCPMC8928575
OpenAlexW4200278639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.