Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34883175›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2022

Evaluation of multiple analytical methods for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in wastewater samples.

Devrim Kaya, Debra Niemeier, Warish Ahmed, Birthe V Kjellerup

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The potential of long-term wastewater-based surveillance to predict COVID-19 waves peak in Mexico.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Assessment of virus concentration methods for detecting SARS-CoV-2 IN wastewater.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Devrim KayaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 1147 Glenn L. Martin Hall, USA. Electronic address: devkaya@gmail.com.
Debra NiemeierDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 1147 Glenn L. Martin Hall, USA; Maryland Transportation Institute, 3244 Jeong H. Kim Engineering Bldng, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Warish AhmedCSIRO Land and Water, Ecosciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park 4102, QLD, Australia.
Birthe V KjellerupDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 1147 Glenn L. Martin Hall, USA. Electronic address: bvk@umd.edu.
CSIRO Land and Water · AUUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, 14 virus concentration protocols based on centrifugation, filtration, polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation and ultrafiltration were tested for their efficacy for the quantification of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater samples. These protocols were paired with four RNA extraction procedures resulting in a combination of 50 unique approaches. Bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) was used as a process control and seeded in each wastewater sample subjected to all 50 protocols. The recovery of BRSV obtained through the application of 50 unique approaches ranged from <0.03 to 64.7% (±1.6%). Combination of centrifugation as the solid removal step, ultrafiltration (Amicon-UF-15; 100 kDa cut-off; protocol 9) as the primary virus concentration method, and Zymo Quick-RNA extraction kit provided the highest BRSV recovery (64.7 ± 1.6%). To determine the impact of prolonged storage of large wastewater sample volume (900 mL) at -20 °C on enveloped virus decay, the BRSV seeded wastewaters samples were stored at -20 °C up to 110 days and analyzed using the most efficient concentration (protocol 9) and extraction (Zymo Quick-RNA kit) methods. BRSV RNA followed a first-order decay rate (k = 0.04/h with r

Indexed as

COVID-19WastewaterAnimalsCattleHumansRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2UltrafiltrationRNA, ViralWastewaterCOVID-19RT-qPCRSARS-CoV-2SurveillanceVirus concentrationWastewater

Identifiers

PMID34883175
PMCPMC8648376
OpenAlexW4200095745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.