Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34882952›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2022

Number of growth days and not length of the growth period determines radial stem growth of temperate trees.

Sophia Etzold, Frank Sterck, Arun K Bose, Sabine Braun, Nina Buchmann, Werner Eugster, Arthur Gessler, Ansgar Kahmen, Richard L Peters, Yann Vitasse and 3 more

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sophia EtzoldSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5383-2228
Frank SterckForest Ecology and Management Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7559-6572
Arun K BoseSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8581-1651
Sabine BraunInstitute of Applied Plant Biology AG, Witterswil, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4268-7659
Nina BuchmannDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0826-2980
Werner EugsterDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6067-0741
Arthur GesslerSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Ansgar KahmenDepartment of Environmental Science, Physiological Plant Ecology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7823-5163
Richard L PetersSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7441-1297
Yann VitasseSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-505X
Lorenz WalthertSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1790-8563
Kasia ZiemińskaSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7750-4758
Roman ZweifelSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9438-0582

Funding

Federal Office for the Environment FOEN 00.25992A/08B6EC6C3Federal Office for the Environment FOEN 00.25992A/E3D4E3424Federal Office for the Environment FOEN 18.0031.PJ/E2C9DDCC1Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 20FI20_173691Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 20FI21_148992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radial stem growth dynamics at seasonal resolution are essential to understand how forests respond to climate change. We studied daily radial growth of 160 individuals of seven temperate tree species at 47 sites across Switzerland over 8 years. Growth of all species peaked in the early part of the growth season and commenced shortly before the summer solstice, but with species-specific seasonal patterns. Day length set a window of opportunity for radial growth. Within this window, the probability of daily growth was constrained particularly by air and soil moisture, resulting in intermittent growth to occur only on 29 to 77 days (30% to 80%) within the growth period. The number of days with growth largely determined annual growth, whereas the growth period length contributed less. We call for accounting for these non-linear intra-annual and species-specific growth dynamics in tree and forest models to reduce uncertainties in predictions under climate change.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeSoilHumansSeasonsSpecies SpecificitySoildendrometerintra-annual growthphenologyseasonalitysoil water potentialtree growthTreeNetvapour pressure deficit

Identifiers

PMID34882952
PMCPMC9299935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.