ArticlePloS one2021
Variable expression of eighteen common housekeeping genes in human non-cancerous kidney biopsies.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Amino acid variants in the HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DQB1 molecules explain the major association of variants with relapse status in pediatric patients with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Identification of Epigenetic Biomarkers of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Progression: A Workflow to Assess Local Gene Expression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Systematic Identification of the Optimal Housekeeping Genes for Accurate Transcriptomic and Proteomic Profiling of Tissues following Complex Traumatic Injury.Methods and protocols · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Housekeeping, or reference genes (RGs) are, by definition, loci with stable expression profiles that are widely used as internal controls to normalize mRNA levels. However, due to specific events, such as pathological changes, or technical procedures, their expression might be altered, failing to fulfil critical normalization pre-requisites. To identify RG genes suitable as internal controls in human non-cancerous kidney tissue, we selected 18 RG candidates based on previous data and screen them in 30 expression datasets (>800 patients), including our own, publicly available or provided by independent groups. Datasets included specimens from patients with hypertensive and diabetic nephropathy, Fabry disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, IgA nephropathy, membranous nephropathy, and minimal change disease. We examined both microdissected and whole section-based datasets. Expression variability of 4 candidate genes (YWHAZ, SLC4A1AP, RPS13 and ACTB) was further examined by qPCR in biopsies from patients with hypertensive nephropathy (n = 11) and healthy controls (n = 5). Only YWHAZ gene expression remained stable in all datasets whereas SLC4A1AP was stable in all but one Fabry dataset. All other RGs were differentially expressed in at least 2 datasets, and in 4.5 datasets on average. No differences in YWHAZ, SLC4A1AP, RPS13 and ACTB gene expression between hypertensive and control biopsies were detected by qPCR. Although RGs suitable to all techniques and tissues are unlikely to exist, our data suggest that in non-cancerous kidney biopsies expression of YWHAZ and SLC4AIAP genes is stable and suitable for normalization purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.