Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34882701›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

An assessment of marine, estuarine, and riverine habitat vulnerability to climate change in the Northeast U.S.

Emily R Farr, Michael R Johnson, Mark W Nelson, Jonathan A Hare, Wendy E Morrison, Matthew D Lettrich, Bruce Vogt, Christopher Meaney, Ursula A Howson, Peter J Auster and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. New York State Climate Impacts Assessment Chapter 05: Ecosystems.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Emily R FarrOffice of Habitat Conservation, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8293-6520
Michael R JohnsonHabitat and Ecosystem Services Division, Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Gloucester, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0846-7978
Mark W NelsonECS, Under contract to the Office of Science and Technology, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2575-2183
Jonathan A HareNortheast Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Wendy E MorrisonOffice of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Matthew D LettrichECS, Under contract to the Office of Science and Technology, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4749-2260
Bruce VogtNOAA Chesapeake Bay Office, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Annapolis, Maryland, United States of America.
Christopher MeaneyGulf of Maine Coastal Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Falmouth, Maine, United States of America.
Ursula A HowsonOffice of Renewable Energy Programs, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Sterling, Virginia, United States of America.
Peter J AusterMystic Aquarium & University of Connecticut, Groton, Connecticut, United States of America.
Frank A BorsukRegion 3, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Wheeling, West Virginia, United States of America.
Damian C BradyDarling Marine Center, University of Maine, Walpole, Maine, United States of America.
Matthew J CashmanMaryland-Delaware-DC Water Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6635-4309
Phil ColarussoRegion 1, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jonathan H GrabowskiMarine Science Center, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.
James P HawkesNortheast Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Orono, Maine, United States of America.
Renee Mercaldo-AllenMilford Laboratory, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Milford, Connecticut, United States of America.
David B PackerJames J. Howard Marine Sciences Laboratory, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Highlands, New Jersey, United States of America.
David K StevensonHabitat and Ecosystem Services Division, Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Gloucester, Massachusetts, United States of America.
NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USMaine Medical Center · USNortheastern University · USUnited States Fish and Wildlife Service · USUnited States Geological Survey · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change is impacting the function and distribution of habitats used by marine, coastal, and diadromous species. These impacts often exacerbate the anthropogenic stressors that habitats face, particularly in the coastal environment. We conducted a climate vulnerability assessment of 52 marine, estuarine, and riverine habitats in the Northeast U.S. to develop an ecosystem-scale understanding of the impact of climate change on these habitats. The trait-based assessment considers the overall vulnerability of a habitat to climate change to be a function of two main components, sensitivity and exposure, and relies on a process of expert elicitation. The climate vulnerability ranks ranged from low to very high, with living habitats identified as the most vulnerable. Over half of the habitats examined in this study are expected to be impacted negatively by climate change, while four habitats are expected to have positive effects. Coastal habitats were also identified as highly vulnerable, in part due to the influence of non-climate anthropogenic stressors. The results of this assessment provide regional managers and scientists with a tool to inform habitat conservation, restoration, and research priorities, fisheries and protected species management, and coastal and ocean planning.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystemConservation of Natural ResourcesEstuariesNew England

Identifiers

PMID34882701
PMCPMC8659346
OpenAlexW4200266180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.