Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34882692›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Preferences of seniors living in selected Baltic Sea region countries towards the use of indoor public space furniture.

Beata Fabisiak, Anna Jankowska, Robert Kłos, Joan Knudsen, Catharina Gillsjö, Igor Kuprienko, Lyudmila Vidiasova, Anja Poberznik, Vineta Kreigere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Beata FabisiakDepartment of Furniture Design, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3279-5632
Anna JankowskaDepartment of Economics and Economic Policy in Agribusiness, Faculty of Economics, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Robert KłosDepartment of Furniture Design, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Joan KnudsenDevelopment Centre UMT, secretariat for Lifestyle & Design Cluster, Herning, Denmark.
Catharina GillsjöUniversity of Skövde, School of Health Sciences, Skövde, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3970-1288
Igor KuprienkoProject Development Division, ITMO University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Lyudmila Vidiasovae-Governance center, Institute of Design and Urban Studies,, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Anja PoberznikSatakunta University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Technology, Pori, Finland.
Vineta KreigereArt Academy of Latvia, Rīga, Latvia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Demographic changes can be observed all over the world. The number of seniors located in the societies of well-developed countries continues to rise. Both enterprises and governments need to be prepared for such changes. Consequently, public spaces need to evolve to reduce problems related to ageism and be friendly to all. Much attention is currently being paid to finding solutions for redesigning public spaces and adjusting them to the needs and requirements of senior citizens. To identify the preferences of seniors in relation to the characteristics of furniture in indoor public spaces, a survey study with 1539 respondents aged 60+ was conducted in Denmark, Finland, Latvia, Poland, Russia and Sweden. The gathered data were coded and implemented to the unified database. The statistical grouping method was used to recognize the characteristics of the needs and attitudes of seniors related to the use of public space furniture. The main variables taken into consideration in the analysis were the age and gender of respondents and their country of living. Among the most important findings are those indicating the necessity to provide the increased number of furniture for sitting in the public spaces and making sure they are not located too far away from each other. As the main disadvantages of public space furniture respondents indicated the lack of armrests or other solutions to facilitate getting up and/or sitting down, as well as profiled backrests that constitute solid support for the spine. The implementation of these data in the process of rethinking and redesigning public spaces may support the adaptation of indoor public furniture according to the requirements of a very large group of customers, namely, seniors.

Indexed as

Interior Design and FurnishingsAgedAged, 80 and overBaltic StatesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID34882692
PMCPMC8659680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.