ArticlePLoS computational biology2021
Ten simple rules for developing bioinformatics capacity at an academic institution.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reframing bioinformatics capacity development in Africa: from training supply to research-driven demand.Journal of community genetics · 2026Review
- Advancing bioinformatics capacity through Nextflow and nf-core: lessons from an early-to mid-career researchers-focused program at The Kids Research Institute Australia.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Competencies for bioinformatics core facility scientists: extension of the ISCB competency framework for bioinformatics.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Harnessing genomic technologies for one health solutions in the tropics.Globalization and health · 2024Review
- Ten simple rules for computational biologists collaborating with wet lab researchers.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Integrating computational skills in undergraduate Microbiology curricula in developing countries.Biology methods & protocols · 2023Article
- The past, present and future of genomics and bioinformatics: A survey of Brazilian scientists.Genetics and molecular biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.