ArticlePLoS biology2021
Noise-trained deep neural networks effectively predict human vision and its neural responses to challenging images.
Article in PLoS biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic image perturbations reveal persistent gaps between human and machine vision.iScience · 2026Article
- Exposure to naturalistic occlusion promotes generalized, human-like robustness in deep neural networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Behavioral differences between humans and machines arise early in visual processing.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Evaluating few-shot prompting for spectrogram-based lung sound classification using a multimodal language model.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Category-specific perceptual learning of robust object recognition modelled using deep neural networks.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Techniques for Simulating Human Psychophysical Testing of Low-Resolution Phosphene Face Images in Artificial Vision.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Perceptual Expertise and Attention: An Exploration using Deep Neural Networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Convolutional neural network models applied to neuronal responses in macaque V1 reveal limited nonlinear processing.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Human-Unrecognizable Differential Private Noised Image Generation Method.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Improved modeling of human vision by incorporating robustness to blur in convolutional neural networks.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Many but not all deep neural network audio models capture brain responses and exhibit correspondence between model stages and brain regions.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- Model metamers reveal divergent invariances between biological and artificial neural networks.Nature neuroscience · 2023Article
- Article
- Graph convolutional network-based feature selection for high-dimensional and low-sample size data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Guiding visual attention in deep convolutional neural networks based on human eye movements.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Integration of allocentric and egocentric visual information in a convolutional/multilayer perceptron network model of goal-directed gaze shifts.Cerebral cortex communications · 2022Article
- Noise increases the correspondence between artificial and human vision.PLoS biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) for object classification have been argued to provide the most promising model of the visual system, accompanied by claims that they have attained or even surpassed human-level performance. Here, we evaluated whether DNNs provide a viable model of human vision when tested with challenging noisy images of objects, sometimes presented at the very limits of visibility. We show that popular state-of-the-art DNNs perform in a qualitatively different manner than humans-they are unusually susceptible to spatially uncorrelated white noise and less impaired by spatially correlated noise. We implemented a noise training procedure to determine whether noise-trained DNNs exhibit more robust responses that better match human behavioral and neural performance. We found that noise-trained DNNs provide a better qualitative match to human performance; moreover, they reliably predict human recognition thresholds on an image-by-image basis. Functional neuroimaging revealed that noise-trained DNNs provide a better correspondence to the pattern-specific neural representations found in both early visual areas and high-level object areas. A layer-specific analysis of the DNNs indicated that noise training led to broad-ranging modifications throughout the network, with greater benefits of noise robustness accruing in progressively higher layers. Our findings demonstrate that noise-trained DNNs provide a viable model to account for human behavioral and neural responses to objects in challenging noisy viewing conditions. Further, they suggest that robustness to noise may be acquired through a process of visual learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.