Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34882277›Full record

ArticleScience and engineering ethics2021

"In Our Own Little World": Invisibility of the Social and Ethical Dimension of Engineering Among Undergraduate Students.

Jae Hoon Lim, Brittany D Hunt, Nickcoy Findlater, Peter T Tkacik, Jerry L Dahlberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jae Hoon LimCato College of Education, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd, , Charlotte, NC, USA. jhlim@uncc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8167-1866
Brittany D HuntCato College of Education, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd, , Charlotte, NC, USA.
Nickcoy FindlaterLee College of Engineering, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd, , Charlotte, NC, USA.
Peter T TkacikLee College of Engineering, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd, , Charlotte, NC, USA.
Jerry L DahlbergLee College of Engineering, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd, , Charlotte, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores how undergraduate students understood the social relevance of their engineering course content knowledge and drew (or failed to draw) broader social and ethical implications from that knowledge. Based on a three-year qualitative study in a junior-level engineering class, we found that students had difficulty in acknowledging the social and ethical aspects of engineering as relevant topics in their coursework. Many students considered the immediate technical usability or improved efficiency of technical innovations as the noteworthy social and ethical implications of engineering. Findings suggest that highly-structured engineering programs leave little room for undergraduate students to explore the ethical dimension of engineering content knowledge and interact with other students/programs on campus to expand their "technically-minded" perspective. We discussed the issues of the "culture of disengagement" (Cech, Sci Technol Human Values 39(1):42-72, 2014) fueled by disciplinary elitism, spatial distance, and insulated curriculum prevalent in the current structure of engineering programs. We called for more conscious effort by engineering educators to offer meaningful interdisciplinary engagement opportunities and in-class conversations on ethics that support engineering students' holistic intellectual growth and well-rounded professional ethics.

Indexed as

EngineeringEthics, ProfessionalCurriculumHumansMoralsStudentsEngineering ethicsQualitative researchUndergraduate students

Identifiers

PMID34882277
PMCPMC8660727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.