ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2022
CSM-carbohydrate: protein-carbohydrate binding affinity prediction and docking scoring function.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- CLIMBS: Assessing Carbohydrate-Protein Interactions through a Graph Neural Network Classifier Using Synthetic Negative Data.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Capturing Carbohydrate Conformations and Hydration Interactions with a Polarizable Bond Dipole Potential.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Selective utilization of medicinal polysaccharides by human gut Bacteroides and Parabacteroides species.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Computational toolbox for the analysis of protein-glycan interactions.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Protein-carbohydrate interactions are crucial for many cellular processes but can be challenging to biologically characterise. To improve our understanding and ability to model these molecular interactions, we used a carefully curated set of 370 protein-carbohydrate complexes with experimental structural and biophysical data in order to train and validate a new tool, cutoff scanning matrix (CSM)-carbohydrate, using machine learning algorithms to accurately predict their binding affinity and rank docking poses as a scoring function. Information on both protein and carbohydrate complementarity, in terms of shape and chemistry, was captured using graph-based structural signatures. Across both training and independent test sets, we achieved comparable Pearson's correlations of 0.72 under cross-validation [root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.58 Kcal/mol] and 0.67 on the independent test (RMSE of 1.72 Kcal/mol), providing confidence in the generalisability and robustness of the final model. Similar performance was obtained across mono-, di- and oligosaccharides, further highlighting the applicability of this approach to the study of larger complexes. We show CSM-carbohydrate significantly outperformed previous approaches and have implemented our method and make all data freely available through both a user-friendly web interface and application programming interface, to facilitate programmatic access at http://biosig.unimelb.edu.au/csm_carbohydrate/. We believe CSM-carbohydrate will be an invaluable tool for helping assess docking poses and the effects of mutations on protein-carbohydrate affinity, unravelling important aspects that drive binding recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.