Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34882231›Full record

ArticleBiochemical Society transactions2021

Controlled power: how biology manages succinate-driven energy release.

Shona A Mookerjee, Akos A Gerencser, Mark A Watson, Martin D Brand

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemical Society transactions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Journal of bacteriology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shona A MookerjeeDepartment of Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Touro University California College of Pharmacy, Vallejo, CA, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0001-7879-1250
Akos A GerencserBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA, U.S.A.
Mark A WatsonBuck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA, U.S.A.
Martin D BrandDepartment of Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Touro University California College of Pharmacy, Vallejo, CA, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0003-4418-6153
Buck Institute for Research on Aging · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oxidation of succinate by mitochondria can generate a higher protonmotive force (pmf) than can oxidation of NADH-linked substrates. Fundamentally, this is because of differences in redox potentials and gearing. Biology adds kinetic constraints that tune the oxidation of NADH and succinate to ensure that the resulting mitochondrial pmf is suitable for meeting cellular needs without triggering pathology. Tuning within an optimal range is used, for example, to shift ATP consumption between different consumers. Conditions that overcome these constraints and allow succinate oxidation to drive pmf too high can cause pathological generation of reactive oxygen species. We discuss the thermodynamic properties that allow succinate oxidation to drive pmf higher than NADH oxidation, and discuss the evidence for kinetic tuning of ATP production and for pathologies resulting from substantial succinate oxidation in vivo.

Indexed as

AnimalsEnergy MetabolismMitochondriaSuccinic AcidThermodynamicsSuccinic Acidbioenergeticsischaemia-reperfusion injurymembrane potentialmitochondriareactive oxygen speciesthermodynamics

Identifiers

PMID34882231
PMCPMC8786295
OpenAlexW4200572411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.