Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34882183›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Effectiveness of an Annular Closure Device to Prevent Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Secondary Analysis With 5 Years of Follow-up.

Claudius Thomé, Adisa Kuršumovic, Peter Douglas Klassen, Gerrit J Bouma, Richard Bostelmann, Frederic Martens, Martin Barth, Mark Arts, Larry E Miller, Peter Vajkoczy and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01283438 (A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Demonstrate the Superiority of the Barricaid® to Discectomy for Primary Lumbar Disc Herniation), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01283438 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Demonstrate the Superiority of the Barricaid® to Discectomy for Primary Lumbar Disc Herniation: Extended Follow-Up of the Barricaid® Annular Closure Device (ACD) Randomized Control Trial (RCT) Postmarket Cohort for Lumbar Disc Herniation and Interaction With Other Risk Factors

TypeinterventionalSponsorIntrinsic TherapeuticsRan2010 to 2025Enrolled554ConditionsLumbar Disc HerniationArmsBarricaid, Standard of Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Surgical treatment variations and intraoperative findings related to annular defects in a cohort of lumbar discectomy patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Return to sports after lumbar disc herniation surgery: a survey of German surgeons and postoperative patient experiences.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Lumbar Disc Herniation: What's New in Surgical Treatment.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2026
    Article
  8. [Short-term effecetiveness of endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with annular suturing in treatment of lumbar disc herniation].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Annular Closure Device Reduces Symptomatic Reherniation Rates: Results of a Meta-analysis.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 14 institutions in 6 countries.

Claudius ThoméDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Adisa KuršumovicDepartment of Neurosurgery, Donauisar Klinikum Deggendorf, Deggendorf, Germany.
Peter Douglas KlassenDepartment of Neurosurgery, St Bonifatius Hospital, Lingen, Germany.
Gerrit J BoumaDepartment of Neurosurgery, OLVG-West and Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Richard BostelmannDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Frederic MartensDepartment of Neurosurgery, OLV Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium.
Martin BarthDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Mark ArtsDepartment of Neurosurgery, HMC Westeinde, Den Hague, the Netherlands.
Larry E MillerMiller Scientific, Johnson City, Tennessee.
Peter VajkoczyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
Robert HesDepartment of Neurosurgery, AZ Klina, Brasschaat, Belgium.
Sandro EustacchioDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Dharmin NandaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Hans-Peter KöhlerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Asklepios Westklinikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Christopher BrenkeDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Charlotte FlühDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Erik Van de KelftDepartment of Neurosurgery, AZ Nikolaas, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium & Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp University, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Richard AssakerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France.
Jenny C KienzlerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Javier FandinoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Annular Closure RCT Study Group
Kantonsspital Aarau · CHUniversity Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum · DEAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLAsklepios · DEAZ Klina · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDeggendorf Institute of Technology · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEInnsbruck Medical University · ATIsala · NLMedical University of Graz · ATOnze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital · BESt. Bonifatius Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients with large annular defects following lumbar microdiscectomy for disc herniation are at increased risk for symptomatic recurrence and reoperation. Objective: To determine whether a bone-anchored annular closure device in addition to lumbar microdiscectomy resulted in lower reherniation and reoperation rates vs lumbar microdiscectomy alone. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial reports 5-year follow-up for enrolled patients between December 2010 and October 2014 at 21 clinical sites. Patients in this study had a large annular defect (6-10 mm width) following lumbar microdiscectomy for treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Statistical analysis was performed from November to December 2020. Interventions: Lumbar microdiscectomy with additional bone-anchored annular closure device (device group) or lumbar microdiscectomy only (control group). Main Outcomes and Measures: The incidence of symptomatic reherniation, reoperation, and adverse events as well as changes in leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and health-related quality of life when comparing the device and control groups over 5 years of follow-up. Results: Among 554 randomized participants (mean [SD] age: 43 [11] years; 327 [59%] were men), 550 were included in the modified intent-to-treat efficacy population (device group: n = 272; 270 [99%] were White); control group: n = 278; 273 [98%] were White) and 550 were included in the as-treated safety population (device group: n = 267; control group: n = 283). The risk of symptomatic reherniation (18.8% [SE, 2.5%] vs 31.6% [SE, 2.9%]; P < .001) and reoperation (16.0% [SE, 2.3%] vs 22.6% [SE, 2.6%]; P = .03) was lower in the device group. There were 53 reoperations in 40 patients in the device group and 82 reoperations in 58 patients in the control group. Scores for leg pain severity, Oswestry Disability Index, and health-related quality of life significantly improved over 5 years of follow-up with no clinically relevant differences between groups. The frequency of serious adverse events was comparable between the treatment groups. Serious adverse events associated with the device or procedure were less frequent in the device group (12.0% vs 20.5%; difference, -8.5%; 95% CI, -14.6% to -2.3%; P = .008). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients who are at high risk of recurrent herniation following lumbar microdiscectomy owing to a large defect in the annulus fibrosus, this study's findings suggest that annular closure with a bone-anchored implant lowers the risk of symptomatic recurrence and reoperation over 5 years of follow-up. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01283438.

Indexed as

AdultDiskectomyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLumbar VertebraeMaleMicrosurgeryMiddle AgedQuality of LifeReoperationResins, SyntheticRisk FactorsTime FactorsResins, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID34882183
PMCPMC8662371
OpenAlexW4200566057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.