ArticleJAMA network open2021
Trends in Use of Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients With Solid Tumors by Race and Ethnicity After Implementation of the Medicare National Coverage Determination.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Barriers and facilitators to next-generation sequencing use in United States oncology settings: a systematic review.Future oncology (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- National Trends in Thyroidectomy and Molecular Diagnostic Utilization: A Medicare Analysis (2016-2023).The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Genomic Testing Uptake Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Precision oncology's translation gap-Can molecular tumor boards bridge it?PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Medicare Insurance Type and Broad Genomic Profiling in Metastatic Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Trends and Disparities in the Use of Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients With Cancer in the United States.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Unique Features of a Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Panel: Expanding Treatment Options in a Value-Based Community Oncology Network.JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- State-level opportunities to advance biomarker testing in patients with advanced cancers and state-regulated plans.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Genomic Medicine: Considerations for Addressing Health Equity.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2025Article
- Review
- A rising tide lifts all boats in the personalized cancer care continuum for mNSCLC: bridging inequities in NGS fosters equity in targeted treatment.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Oncogenic gene fusions in cancer: from biology to therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Claim Denials for Cancer-Related Next-Generation Sequencing in Medicare.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Disparities in Next-Generation Genetic Sequencing Among Individuals with Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Strength of evidence underlying the CMS-FDA parallel review of comprehensive genomic profiling tests in the cancer setting.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Existing Health Inequities in the Treatment of Advanced and Metastatic Cancers.Current oncology reports · 2024Review
- Trends and Disparities in Next-Generation Sequencing in Metastatic Prostate and Urothelial Cancers.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Availability and utilization of molecular testing for primary central nervous system tumors among US hospitals.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2024Article
- Racial and Ethnic Inequities at the Practice and Physician Levels in Timely Next-Generation Sequencing for Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated in the US Community Setting.JCO oncology practice · 2024Article
- Trends and Clinical Characteristics of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Genetic Panel Tests: An Analysis of Korean Nationwide Claims Data.Cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: In March 2018, Medicare issued a national coverage determination (NCD) for next-generation sequencing (NGS) to facilitate access to NGS testing among Medicare beneficiaries. It is unknown whether the NCD affected health equity issues for Medicare beneficiaries and the overall population. Objective: To examine the association between the Medicare NCD and NGS use by insurance types and race and ethnicity. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using electronic health record data derived from a real-world database. Data originated from approximately 280 cancer clinics (approximately 800 sites of care) in the US. Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), metastatic breast cancer (mBC), or advanced melanoma diagnosed from January 1, 2011, through March 31, 2020, were included. Exposure: Pre- vs post-NCD period. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients were classified by insurance type and race and ethnicity to examine patterns in NGS testing less than or equal to 60 days after diagnosis. Difference-in-differences models examined changes in average NGS testing in the pre- and post-NCD periods by race and ethnicity, and interrupted time-series analysis examined whether trends over time varied by insurance type and race and ethnicity. Results: Among 92 687 patients with aNSCLC, mCRC, mBC, or advanced melanoma, mean (SD) age was 66.6 (11.2) years, 51 582 (55.7%) were women, and 63 864 (68.9%) were Medicare beneficiaries. The largest racial and ethnic categories according to the database used and further classification were Black or African American (8605 [9.3%]) and non-Hispanic White (59 806 [64.5%]). Compared with Medicare beneficiaries, changes in pre- to post-NCD NGS testing trends were similar in commercially insured patients (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.98-1.08; P = .25). Pre- to post-NCD NGS testing trends increased at a slower rate among patients in assistance programs (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.99; P = .03) compared with Medicare beneficiaries. The rate of increase for patients receiving Medicaid was not statistically significantly different compared with those receiving Medicare (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.84-1.01; P = .07). The NCD was not associated with statistically significant changes in NGS use trends by racial and ethnic groups within Medicare beneficiaries alone or across all insurance types. Compared with non-Hispanic White individuals, increases in average NGS use from the pre-NCD to post-NCD period were 14% lower (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74-0.99; P = .04) among African American and 23% lower (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.96; P = .02) among Hispanic/Latino individuals; increases among Asian individuals and those with other races and ethnicities were similar. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that expansion of Medicare-covered benefits may not occur equally across insurance types, thereby further widening or maintaining disparities in NGS testing. Additional efforts beyond coverage policies are needed to ensure equitable access to the benefits of precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.