Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34881952›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance2021

Attention, task demands, and multitalker processing costs in speech perception.

David Saltzman, Sahil Luthra, Emily B Myers, James S Magnuson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Why are listeners hindered by talker variability?Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024
    Review
  6. Multiple sources of acoustic variation affect speech processing efficiency.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David SaltzmanDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0002-7244-5274
Sahil LuthraDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0002-3517-2609
Emily B MyersDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0002-9475-764X
James S MagnusonDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0003-0158-2367

Funding

The Role of Frontal and Temporal Brain Areas in the Perception of Phonetic Category StructureR01DC013064 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI MYERS, EMILY B · 2014 to 2025
$4.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013064NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining how human listeners achieve phonetic constancy despite a variable mapping between the acoustics of speech and phonemic categories is the longest standing challenge in speech perception. A clue comes from studies where the talker changes randomly between stimuli, which slows processing compared with a single-talker baseline. These multitalker processing costs have been observed most often in speeded monitoring paradigms, where participants respond whenever a specific item occurs. Notably, the conventional paradigm imposes attentional demands via two forms of varied mapping in mixed-talker conditions. First, target recycling (i.e., allowing items to serve as targets on some trials but as distractors on others) potentially prevents the development of task automaticity. Second, in mixed trials, participants must respond to two unique stimuli (i.e., one target produced by each talker), whereas in blocked conditions, they need respond to only one token (i.e., multiple target tokens). We seek to understand how attentional demands influence talker normalization, as measured by multitalker processing costs. Across four experiments, multitalker processing costs persisted when target recycling was not allowed but diminished when only one stimulus served as the target on mixed trials. We discuss the logic of using varied mapping to elicit attentional effects and implications for theories of speech perception. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionAcousticsAttentionHumansPhoneticsSpeech

Identifiers

PMID34881952
PMCPMC10249717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.