Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34881948›Full record

ArticlePsychology and aging2022

Psychological processes in adapting to dementia: Illness representations among the IDEAL cohort.

Linda Clare, Laura D Gamble, Anthony Martyr, Catherine Quinn, Rachael Litherland, Robin G Morris, Ian R Jones, Fiona E Matthews

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology and aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Linda ClareREACH-Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health.ORCID 0000-0003-3989-5318
Laura D GamblePopulation Health Sciences Institute.ORCID 0000-0001-8496-9705
Anthony MartyrREACH-Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health.ORCID 0000-0002-1702-8902
Catherine QuinnFaculty of Health Studies.ORCID 0000-0001-9553-853X
Rachael LitherlandInnovations in Dementia CIC.
Robin G MorrisInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience.ORCID 0000-0001-7767-5258
Ian R JonesWales Institute for Social and Economic Research and Data.ORCID 0000-0002-1682-9134
Fiona E MatthewsPopulation Health Sciences Institute.ORCID 0000-0002-1728-2388

Funding

Alzheimer's Society; Centers of ExcellenceEconomic and Social Research Council/National Institute for Health ResearchNational Institute for Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How people understand and adapt to living with dementia may influence well-being. Leventhal's Common Sense Model (CSM) of Self-Regulation provides a theoretical basis for exploring this process. We used cross-sectional and longitudinal data from 1,109 people with mild-to-moderate dementia in the Improving the experience of Dementia and Enhancing Active Life (IDEAL) cohort. We elicited dementia representations (DRs) using the Representations and Adjustment to Dementia Index (RADIX), a validated measure based on the CSM, identified groups sharing distinct DR profiles, and explored predictors of group membership and associations with well-being, and whether problem-focused coping played a mediating role in these associations. We identified four DR classes: people who see the condition as a disease and adopt a diagnostic label; people who see the condition as a disease but refer to symptoms rather than a diagnostic label; those who see the condition as part of aging; and those who are unsure how to make sense of the condition. A fifth group did not acknowledge any difficulties. "Disease" representations were associated with better cognition and younger age, while "aging" and "no problem" representations were associated with better mood and well-being. The association with well-being remained stable over 24 months. There was limited partial support for a mediating role of problem-focused coping. Variations in DRs may reflect individual differences in the psychological processes involved in adjusting to dementia. DRs provide a framework for personalizing and tailoring both communications about dementia and interventions aimed at supporting people in coping with dementia. There is a need to debate what constitutes a positive DR and how its development might be encouraged. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

DementiaAdaptation, PsychologicalAgingCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID34881948
PMCPMC9134708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.