Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34881938›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2021

Prediction of posttraumatic stress and depression one-month post-injury: A comparison of two screening instruments.

Naomi Ennis, Margaret Anton, Olivia Bravoco, Leigh Ridings, Josh Hunt, Terri A deRoon-Cassini, Tatiana Davidson, Kenneth Ruggiero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Naomi EnnisDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-2961-3153
Margaret AntonCollege of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina.
Olivia BravocoCollege of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina.
Leigh RidingsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina.
Josh HuntClement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center.
Terri A deRoon-CassiniDivision of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0002-9485-0625
Tatiana DavidsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina.
Kenneth RuggieroDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina.

Funding

A Scalable mHealth Resource to Facilitate Behavioral and Emotional Recovery after Pediatric Traumatic Injury - SuplementK23HD098325 · NICHD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI RIDINGS, LEIGH E. · 2020 to 2024
$794k
Acute Endocannabinoid activity involved in hyperarousal, memory formation, and non-remitting PTSD: A dense sampling approachR56MH116656 · NIMH · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI DEROON-CASSINI, TERRI A., HILLARD, CECILIA J · 2019 to 2019
$376k
National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Institutes of Mental HealthNICHD NIH HHS K23 HD098325NICHD NIH HHS L30 HD099795NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH116656SmartState South Carolina Centers of Economic ExcellenceThe Duke EndowmentU.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Health Resources and Services Administration
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the combined and individual utility of 2 screening tools in prediction of depression and PTSD one-month post traumatic injury.

method484 Level I Trauma Center patients were administered the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) and Injured Trauma Survivor Screen (ITSS). Approximately 30 days post-injury, patients completed the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8).

resultsReceiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curves for the PDI suggested a cutoff score of 17.5 predicting PTSD (Sensitivity = 70%; Specificity = 62%) and depression (Sensitivity = 74%; Specificity = 64%). For the ITSS, ROC curves suggested a cutoff score of 1.5 to predict PTSD (Sensitivity = 72%; Specificity = 60%) and depression (Sensitivity = 67%; Specificity = 62%). Inclusion of both instruments in regression analyses accounted for 2.4%-6.8% greater variance than 1 measure alone in predicting PCL-5 and PHQ-8 scores.

conclusionsThe ITSS and PDI each demonstrated significant clinical utility in practice. Use of both measures, versus either alone, likely does not produce sufficient added clinical benefit. Follow-up screening and/or ongoing symptom monitoring is recommended as an adjunct to brief bedside screening. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticDepressionHumansMass ScreeningSensitivity and SpecificityTrauma Centers

Identifiers

PMID34881938
PMCPMC9245030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.