ArticleAnalytical chemistry2021
Online μSEC
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methods for the Investigation of Protein-Ligands Interactions.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Small-Scale Serial Size Exclusion Chromatography (sAnalytical chemistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proteoform-resolved information, obtained by top-down (TD) "intact protein" proteomics, is expected to contribute substantially to the understanding of molecular pathogenic mechanisms and, in turn, identify novel therapeutic and diagnostic targets. However, the robustness of mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of intact proteins in complex biological samples is hindered by the high dynamic range in protein concentration and mass, protein instability, and buffer complexity. Here, we describe an evolutionary step for intact protein investigations through the online implementation of tandem microflow size-exclusion chromatography with nanoflow reversed-phase liquid chromatography and MS (μSEC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.