Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34881352›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2021

Benefits and Drawbacks of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Use in Young Children With Type 1 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study From a Country Where the CGM Is Not Reimbursed.

Kağan Ege Karakuş, Sibel Sakarya, Gül Yeşiltepe Mutlu, Metehan Berkkan, Serra Muradoğlu, Ecem Can, Tuğba Gökçe, Elif Eviz, Şükrü Hatun

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kağan Ege KarakuşKoç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8552-5206
Sibel SakaryaKoç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gül Yeşiltepe MutluKoç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Metehan BerkkanKoç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Serra MuradoğluDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ecem CanDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tuğba GökçeDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Elif EvizDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Şükrü HatunKoç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Koç University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigating the daily life experiences of patients using Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) can highlight the benefits and barriers in using this system for people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with the caregivers of 10 children aged <9 years, all of whom had been treated for T1D and had used CGM >6 months. These interviews were analyzed using the content analysis approach and from these interviews, four meta themes emerged: metabolic control, barriers to CGM use, CGM use in daily life, and comparison with fingersticks. Families reported the following as benefits of CGM: pain relief, better hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia management, increased control over diet and social life, reduced worries at school and during the night, and convenience in entrusting the child to the care of others. Cost, concerns related to accuracy and reliability of measurements, insertion, adhesion and removal issues all emerged as barriers to CGM use. The most prominent issue was the economic burden of CGM. Families accept this burden, even though it is challenging, as their experiences in using CGM are positive and they feel that CGM is necessary for T1D management.

Indexed as

continuous glucose monitoringfamily experiencesqualitative methodsType 1 diabetesyoung children

Identifiers

PMID34881352
PMCPMC8646182
OpenAlexW4205518977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.