Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34881347›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2021

Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Primary Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With Palmaris Versus Hamstring Tendon Grafts: A Systematic Review.

David P Trofa, Michael Constant, Connor R Crutchfield, Nicholas J Dantzker, Bryan M Saltzman, T Sean Lynch, Christopher S Ahmad

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries in Contact Athletes.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David P TrofaDepartment of Orthopedics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Michael ConstantDepartment of Orthopedics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Connor R CrutchfieldDepartment of Orthopedics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Nicholas J DantzkerDepartment of Orthopedics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Bryan M SaltzmanDepartment of Orthopedics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
T Sean LynchDepartment of Orthopedics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Christopher S AhmadDepartment of Orthopedics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUlnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction is the current gold standard of treatment for overhead athletes with a symptomatic, deficient UCL of the elbow who have failed nonoperative treatment and wish to return to sport (RTS) at a high level. The palmaris longus and hamstring tendons are common graft choices, but no study has analyzed the existing literature to assess whether one graft is superior to the other. PURPOSE: To systematically report on the outcomes of UCL reconstruction using palmaris and hamstring autografts. STUDY

designSystematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

methodsA combination of the terms "ulnar collateral ligament," "valgus instability," "Tommy John surgery," "hamstring," and "palmaris longus" were searched in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. RTS and return-to-same-level (RSL) rates, patient-reported outcomes, and complications were included for analysis. We used the modified Coleman Methodology Score and risk-of-bias tool for nonrandomized studies to assess the quality of the included studies.

resultsThis review included 6 studies (combined total of 2154 elbows) that directly compared palmaris and hamstring graft use in UCL reconstruction. Follow-up ranged from 24 to 80.4 months, and the mean patient age across all studies was 21.8 years. The mean RSL across all studies and grafts was 79.0%, and the mean RTS was 84.1%, consistent with results previously reported in the literature. The mean RTS and RSL rates for the palmaris graft group were 84.6% and 82%, respectively; the hamstring graft group showed mean RTS and RSL rates of 80.8% and 80.8%. Meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in RSL between the 2 graft groups (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.77-1.46). The combined complication rate of the included studies was 18.2%, with failure rates ranging from 0% to 7.1%.

conclusionResults of this review indicated that both palmaris and hamstring tendon grafts are viable options for primary UCL reconstruction. Graft choice should be determined by a combination of patient and surgeon preference.

Indexed as

hamstringpalmaris longusreturn to sport (RTS)Tommy John surgeryulnar collateral ligament

Identifiers

PMID34881347
PMCPMC8646802
OpenAlexW4200416317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.