Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34881187›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Post-Operative Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer: Is It Time for a Belt and Braces Approach?

Nicolas Giraud, Nicolas Benziane-Ouaritini, Ulrike Schick, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Ahmad Chaddad, Tamim Niazi, Mame Daro Faye, Stéphane Supiot, Paul Sargos, Igor Latorzeff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicolas GiraudRadiation Oncology Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
Nicolas Benziane-OuaritiniRadiation Oncology Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
Ulrike SchickRadiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, Brest, France.
Jean-Baptiste BeauvalUrology Department, Clinique la Croix du Sud, Toulouse, France.
Ahmad ChaddadSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, China.
Tamim NiaziDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Mame Daro FayeDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Stéphane SupiotRadiation Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes Saint-Herblain, France.
Paul SargosRadiation Oncology Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
Igor LatorzeffRadiation Oncology Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.
Institut Bergonié · FRMcGill University · CACentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRClinique Pasteur · FRGuilin University of Electronic Technology · CNInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 30% of patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancers experience biochemical recurrence (BCR). Post-operative radiation therapy (RT) can be either offered immediately after the surgery in case of aggressive pathological features or proposed early if BCR occurs. Until recently, little data were available regarding the optimal RT timing, protocol, volumes to treat, and the benefit of adding androgen deprivation therapies to post-operative RT. In this review, we aim to pragmatically discuss current literature data on these points. Early salvage RT appears to be the optimal post-operative approach, improving oncological outcomes especially with low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, as well as sparing several unnecessary adjuvant treatments. The standard RT dose is still 64-66 Gy to the prostate bed in conventional fractionation, but hypofractionation protocols are emerging pending on late toxicity data. Several scientific societies have published contouring atlases, even though they are heterogeneous and deserve future consensus. During salvage RT, the inclusion of pelvic lymph nodes is also controversial, but preliminary data show a possible benefit for PSA > 0.34 ng/ml at the cost of increased hematological side effects. Concomitant ADT and its duration are also discussed, possibly advantageous (at least in terms of metastasis-free survival) for PSA rates over 0.6 ng/ml, taking into account life expectancy and cardiovascular comorbidities. Intensified regimens, for instance, with new-generation hormone therapies, could further improve outcomes in carefully selected patients. Finally, recent advances in molecular imaging, as well as upcoming breakthroughs in genomics and artificial intelligence tools, could soon reshuffle the cards of the current therapeutic strategy.

Indexed as

androgen deprivation therapybiochemical progressionprostate cancerradical prostatectomyradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID34881187
PMCPMC8647553
OpenAlexW3211992888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.