Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34881174›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Radiomics for the Prediction of Epilepsy in Patients With Frontal Glioma.

Ankang Gao, Hongxi Yang, Yida Wang, Guohua Zhao, Chenglong Wang, Haijie Wang, Xiaonan Zhang, Yong Zhang, Jingliang Cheng, Guang Yang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Morphometric and radiomics analysis toward the prediction of epilepsy associated with supratentorial low-grade glioma in children.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ankang GaoDepartment of MRI, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Hongxi YangShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Yida WangShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Guohua ZhaoDepartment of MRI, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Chenglong WangShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Haijie WangShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaonan ZhangDepartment of MRI, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yong ZhangDepartment of MRI, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jingliang ChengDepartment of MRI, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Guang YangShanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Jie BaiDepartment of MRI, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNEast China Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study was conducted in order to investigate the association between radiomics features and frontal glioma-associated epilepsy (GAE) and propose a reliable radiomics-based model to predict frontal GAE.

methodsThis retrospective study consecutively enrolled 166 adult patients with frontal glioma (111 in the training cohort and 55 in the testing cohort). A total 1,130 features were extracted from T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images, including first-order statistics, 3D shape, texture, and wavelet features. Regions of interest, including the entire tumor and peritumoral edema, were drawn manually. Pearson correlation coefficient, 10-fold cross-validation, area under curve (AUC) analysis, and support vector machine were adopted to select the most relevant features to build a clinical model, a radiomics model, and a clinical-radiomics model for GAE. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and AUC were used to evaluate the classification performance of the models in each cohort, and DeLong's test was used to compare the performance of the models. A two-sided

resultsThe classification accuracy of seven scout models, except the wavelet first-order model (0.793) and the wavelet texture model (0.784), was <0.75 in cross-validation. The clinical-radiomics model, including 17 magnetic resonance imaging-based features selected among the 1,130 radiomics features and two clinical features (patient age and tumor grade), achieved better discriminative performance for GAE prediction in both the training [AUC = 0.886, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.819-0.940] and testing cohorts (AUC = 0.836, 95% CI = 0.707-0.937) than the radiomics model (

conclusionRadiomics analysis can non-invasively predict GAE, thus allowing adequate treatment of frontal glioma. The clinical-radiomics model may enable a more precise prediction of frontal GAE. Furthermore, age and pathology grade are important risk factors for GAE.

Indexed as

frontal lobe epilepsygliomaglioma-associated epilepsyradiomicsT2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery

Identifiers

PMID34881174
PMCPMC8645689
OpenAlexW3215167312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.