Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34881098›Full record

ReviewJournal of pathology informatics2021

Generative Adversarial Networks in Digital Pathology and Histopathological Image Processing: A Review.

Laya Jose, Sidong Liu, Carlo Russo, Annemarie Nadort, Antonio Di Ieva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pathology informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Insights Into Spatial Transcriptomics: Exploring Recent Technical Developments and Their Diverse Applications.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laya JoseComputational NeuroSurgery (CNS) Lab, Macquarie Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Sidong LiuComputational NeuroSurgery (CNS) Lab, Macquarie Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Carlo RussoComputational NeuroSurgery (CNS) Lab, Macquarie Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Annemarie NadortARC Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale Biophotonics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Antonio Di IevaComputational NeuroSurgery (CNS) Lab, Macquarie Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital pathology is gaining prominence among the researchers with developments in advanced imaging modalities and new technologies. Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are a recent development in the field of artificial intelligence and since their inception, have boosted considerable interest in digital pathology. GANs and their extensions have opened several ways to tackle many challenging histopathological image processing problems such as color normalization, virtual staining, ink removal, image enhancement, automatic feature extraction, segmentation of nuclei, domain adaptation and data augmentation. This paper reviews recent advances in histopathological image processing using GANs with special emphasis on the future perspectives related to the use of such a technique. The papers included in this review were retrieved by conducting a keyword search on Google Scholar and manually selecting the papers on the subject of H&E stained digital pathology images for histopathological image processing. In the first part, we describe recent literature that use GANs in various image preprocessing tasks such as stain normalization, virtual staining, image enhancement, ink removal, and data augmentation. In the second part, we describe literature that use GANs for image analysis, such as nuclei detection, segmentation, and feature extraction. This review illustrates the role of GANs in digital pathology with the objective to trigger new research on the application of generative models in future research in digital pathology informatics.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligencedeep learningdigital pathologygenerative adversarial networkshistopathologyimage processingwhole-slide imaging

Identifiers

PMID34881098
PMCPMC8609288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.