Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34881096›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2021

Advantages of Using a Web-based Digital Platform for Kidney Preimplantation Biopsies.

Flavia Neri, Albino Eccher, Paolo Rigotti, Ilaria Girolami, Gianluigi Zaza, Giovanni Gambaro, MariaGaia Mastrosimini, Giulia Bencini, Caterina Di Bella, Claudia Mescoli and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Digital pathology structure and deployment in Veneto: a proof-of-concept study.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Article
  6. Cutting-edge technology and automation in the pathology laboratory.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Artificial Intelligence Advances in Transplant Pathology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Digital twin concept: Healthcare, education, research.Journal of pathology informatics · 2023
    Article
  13. Digital pathology all stars.Journal of pathology informatics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Flavia NeriDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Unit of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Albino EccherDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostic, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Paolo RigottiDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Unit of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Ilaria GirolamiDivision of Pathology, Central Hospital Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Gianluigi ZazaDepartment of General Medicine, Renal Unit, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giovanni GambaroDepartment of General Medicine, Renal Unit, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
MariaGaia MastrosiminiDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostic, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giulia BenciniDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Unit of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Caterina Di BellaDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Unit of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Claudia MescoliDepartment of Medicine, Surgical Pathology and Cytopathology Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Luigino BoschieroDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Kidney Transplant Center, Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Stefano MarlettaDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostic, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Paolo Angelo Dei TosDepartment of Medicine, Surgical Pathology and Cytopathology Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Lucrezia FurianDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Unit of Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
University of Padua · ITUniversity of Verona · ITOspedale di Bolzano · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the setting of kidney transplantation, histopathology of kidney biopsies is a key element in the organ assessment and allocation. Despite the broad diffusion of the Remuzzi-Karpinski score on preimplantation kidney biopsies, scientific evidence of its correlation to the transplantation outcome is controversial. The main issues affecting the prognostic value of histopathology are the referral to general on-call pathologists and the semiquantitative feature of the score, which can raise issues of interpretation. Digital pathology has shown very reliable and effective in the oncological diagnosis and treatment; however, the spread of such technologies is lagging behind in the field of transplantation. The aim of our study was to create a digital online platform where whole-slide images (WSI) of preimplantation kidney biopsies could be uploaded and stored.

methodsWe included 210 kidney biopsies collected between January 2015 and December 2019 from the joint collaboration of the transplantation centers of Padua and Verona. The selected slides, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, were digitized and uploaded on a shared web platform. For each case, the on-call pathologists' Remuzzi grades were obtained from the original report, together with the clinical data and the posttransplantation follow-up.

resultsThe storage of WSI of preimplantation kidney biopsies would have several clinical, scientific, and educational advantages. The clinical utility relies on the possibility to consult online expert pathologists and real-time quality checks of diagnosis. From the perspective of follow-up, the archived digitized biopsies can offer a useful comparison to posttransplantation biopsies. In addition, the digital online platform is a precious tool for multidisciplinary meetings aimed both at the clinical discussion and at the design of research projects. Furthermore, this archive of readily available WSI is an important educational resource for the training of professionals.

conclusionsFinally, the web platform lays the foundation for the introduction of artificial intelligence in the field of transplantation that would help create new diagnostic algorithms and tools with the final aim of increasing the precision of organ assessment and its predictive value for transplant outcome.

Indexed as

Digital pathologyinnovation technologypreimplantation biopsy

Identifiers

PMID34881096
PMCPMC8609286
OpenAlexW3208870581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.