ReviewChemical science2021
Cross-dehydrogenative N-N couplings.
Review in Chemical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- General access to azoles through tailored nitrogen-nitrogen bond construction.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Mild and efficient coupling reactions enabled byCatalysis science & technology · 2026Article
- Intercepting Photogenerated Aminyl Radicals at Metal-Halide Perovskite Microcrystals to Forge C─N Bonds With Non-Preactivated Substrates.Small science · 2026Article
- Photo-induced selective N-N bond construction via harnessing nitrene release and transfer.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Electrochemical Synthesis of Methoxy-Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Recent Developments and Challenges in the Enzymatic Formation of Nitrogen-Nitrogen Bonds.ACS catalysis · 2025Review
- Sustainable electrochemical synthesis of aliphatic nitro-Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2025Article
- Development of a Nickel-Catalyzed N-N Coupling for the Synthesis of Hydrazides.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relatively high electronegativity of nitrogen makes N-N bond forming cross-coupling reactions particularly difficult, especially in an intermolecular fashion. The challenge increases even further when considering the case of dehydrogenative N-N coupling reactions, which are advantageous in terms of step and atom economy, but introduce the problem of the oxidant in order to become thermodynamically feasible. Indeed, the oxidizing system must be designed to activate the target N-H bonds, while at the same time avoid undesired N-N homocoupling as well as C-N and C-C coupled side products. Thus, preciously few intermolecular hetero N-N cross-dehydrogenative couplings exist, in spite of the central importance of N-N bonds in organic chemistry. This review aims at analyzing these few rare cases and provides a perspective for future developments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.