Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34880962›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2021

Preparing for Class: Actions and Resources of Introductory Biology Students.

Tina M Ballard, Sabah Sattar, Kendra D Wright, Jaime L Sabel, Heather E Bergan-Roller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tina M BallardDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA.
Sabah SattarDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA.
Kendra D WrightDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Jaime L SabelDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Heather E Bergan-RollerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4580-7775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Instructors want students to be prepared for class. There are several different resources and activities available to help students prepare for class, but very little is known about how students choose to prepare for class in the context of undergraduate biology. In this study, we used content analysis to investigate what students do to prepare for an introductory biology course and if and how that preparation differed under two different conditions. Students were either directed to search out and choose their resources to prepare for class (choice treatment) or assigned specific pages from a textbook (text treatment). Students in the choice treatment reported preparing for class slightly more often than students in the text treatment, with both groups reporting that they prepared for over three-quarters of classes. However, students assigned specific textbook passages engaged more while preparing than students who had to find their resources. The textbook was a popular resource but second to websites for students who got to choose. Students in both groups performed similarly in the course. This work helps instructors understand what their students may be doing to prepare for class. We provide recommendations to guide instructors on how to help their students prepare for class.

Indexed as

actionsactive learningbiologyclass preparationcontent analysisresourcestextbookundergraduate

Identifiers

PMID34880962
PMCPMC8631313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.