Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34880735›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2021

Integrating Cognitive Developmental Neuroscience in Society: Lessons Learned From a Multidisciplinary Research Project on Education and Social Safety of Youth.

Annelinde R E Vandenbroucke, Eveline A Crone, Jan B F van Erp, Berna Güroğlu, Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol, Catherina H de Kogel, Lydia Krabbendam, Lucres M C Jansen, Anne-Marie Brouwer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Annelinde R E VandenbrouckeDevelopmental and Educational Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
Eveline A CroneDevelopmental and Educational Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
Jan B F van ErpTNO, Soesterberg, Netherlands.
Berna GüroğluDevelopmental and Educational Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
Hilleke E Hulshoff PolPsychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Catherina H de KogelResearch and Documentation Centre, Ministry of Justice and Security, Den Haag, Netherlands.
Lydia KrabbendamClinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Free University, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Lucres M C JansenChild and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Anne-Marie BrouwerTNO, Soesterberg, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrating fundamental science in society, with the goal to translate research findings to daily practice, comes with certain challenges. Successfully integrating research projects into society requires (1) good collaboration between scientists and societal stakeholders, (2) collaboration partners with common expectations and goals, and (3) investment in clear communication. Here we describe an integrative research project conducted by a large Dutch consortium that consisted of neuroscientists, psychologists, sociologists, ethicists, teachers, health care professionals and policy makers, focusing on applying cognitive developmental neuroscience for the benefit of youth in education and social safety. We argue that to effectively integrate cognitive developmental neuroscience in society, (1) it is necessary to invest in a well-functioning, diverse and multidisciplinary team involving societal stakeholders and youth themselves from the start of the project. This aids to build a so-called productive interactive network that increases the chances to realize societal impact in the long-term. Additionally, we propose that to integrate knowledge, (2) a different than standard research approach should be taken. When focusing on integration, the ultimate goal of research is not solely to understand the world better, but also to intervene with real-life situations, such as education or (forensic) youth care. To accomplish this goal, we propose an approach in which integration is not only started after the research has been conducted, but taken into account throughout the entire project. This approach helps to create common expectations and goals between different stakeholders. Finally, we argue that (3) dedicating sufficient resources to effective communication, both within the consortium and between scientists and society, greatly benefits the integration of cognitive developmental neuroscience in society.

Indexed as

cognitive developmental neurosciencediversityintegrative methodsocietyteam science

Identifiers

PMID34880735
PMCPMC8645937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.