Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34880690›Full record

ReviewOpen access emergency medicine : OAEM2021

Nasal Packing in the Emergency Department: A Practical Review for Emergency Providers.

Quincy K Tran, Jeremy Barnett, Francis O'Connell, Brian D'Anza, Ali Pourmand

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open access emergency medicine : OAEM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An Analysis of the VELNEZ Nasal Pack's Acceptability and Safety for Use During Nasal Surgery: A Prospective Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Epistaxis Treatment Options: Literature Review.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Quincy K TranDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7774-154X
Jeremy BarnettDepartment of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Francis O'ConnellDepartment of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Brian D'AnzaDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Ali PourmandDepartment of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed a narrative review of epistaxis management in the emergency department. First, we examined the pathophysiology, the current types of treatment that are available to emergency clinicians. When nasal packing is indicated, we examined the efficacy of nasal packing in addition to other topical treatment such as tranexamic acid and the evidence of prophylactic antibiotics. We detailed current studies involving tranexamic acid and prophylactic antibiotics for nasal packing. Finally, we introduced an epistaxis clinical care pathway, based on current evidence, to aid emergency clinicians with their clinical decision-making processes.

Indexed as

clinical care pathwayepistaxisnasal packingtranexamic acid

Identifiers

PMID34880690
PMCPMC8648098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.