Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34880673›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2021

Innovative Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Instability: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial.

Peng Yin, Yi Ding, Lijin Zhou, Chunyang Xu, Haifeng Gao, Daming Pang, Yong Hai, Jincai Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peng Yin *Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, China Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yi Ding *Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, China Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Lijin ZhouDepartment of Orthopaedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, China Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Chunyang XuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, China Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Haifeng GaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, China Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Daming PangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, China Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yong HaiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, China Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jincai YangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, China Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with instability is most common lumbar degenerative diseases for people with low back pain. The objective of this study was to compared the clinical effects for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with degenerative instability between the innovative percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PE-TLIF) technique and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) technique. PATIENTS AND

methodsBetween April 2019 and April 2020, 114 patients with single-segment LSS were prospectively included in our study (ChiCTR1900022492). Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on lumbar and leg pain (VAS-LBP, VAS-LP), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), serum creatine kinase (CK), the maximal cross-sectional area of multifidus muscle (Max-CSA) and the peak intensity of sulphur hexafluoride microbubble contrast agent (PI) around the surgical incision by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography were evaluated preoperatively, post-operatively and at regular follow-up.

resultsAll patients were followed up. The VAS-LBP, VAS-LP, ODI after operation were improved significantly compared to these data before operation in all the patients (P<0.05). The VAS-LBP at 1 weeks, 3 months after operation in PE-TLIF group were significantly lower than these in PLIF group (P<0.05). The injury degree of multifidus muscle evaluated by MAX-CSA and PI was significantly less in PE-TLIF group after operation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference on the complication rate between these two groups (P>0.05).

conclusionOur results presented PE-TLIF technique could obtain comparable effective outcomes as conventional PLIF for the treatment of LSS with degenerative instability. The patients with PE-TLIF had less muscle injury, less pain and quicker postoperative rehabilitation.

Indexed as

lumbar spinal stenosisminimally invasive surgerypainpercutaneousspinal endoscopetransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Identifiers

PMID34880673
PMCPMC8648278
OpenAlexW3216624268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.