Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34880663›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2021

Hanna Glock, Veronica Milos Nymberg, Beata Borgström Bolmsjö, Jonas Holm, Susanna Calling, Moa Wolff, Miriam Pikkemaat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The impact of remote care approaches on continuity in primary care: a mixed-studies systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hanna GlockCenter for Primary Health Care Research, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4103-9748
Veronica Milos NymbergCenter for Primary Health Care Research, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3836-3048
Beata Borgström BolmsjöCenter for Primary Health Care Research, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7655-0613
Jonas HolmCenter for Primary Health Care Research, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9827-4709
Susanna CallingCenter for Primary Health Care Research, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2420-3780
Moa WolffCenter for Primary Health Care Research, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0656-7628
Miriam PikkemaatCenter for Primary Health Care Research, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9808-207X
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe primary care physician's traditional patient contacts are challenged by the rapidly accelerating digital transformation. In a quantitative survey analysis based on the theory of planned behavior, we found high behavioral intention to use telemedicine among Swedish primary care physicians, but low reported use. The aim of this study was to further examine the physicians' experiences regarding telemedicine, with a focus on possible explanations for the gap between intention and use, through analysis of the free-text comments supplied in the survey. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe material was collected through a web-based survey which was sent out to physicians at 160 primary health care centers in southern Sweden from May to August 2019. The survey covered four areas: general experiences of telemedicine, digital contacts, chronic disease monitoring with digital tools, and artificial intelligence. A total of 100 physicians submitted one or more free-text comments. These were analyzed using qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach.

resultsThe primary care physicians expressed

conclusionAll telemedicine tools must be evaluated regarding clinical usefulness, patient safety, and effects on staff workload, and end users should be included in this process. Utmost consideration is needed regarding how to retain the benefits of personal contact between patient and provider when digital solutions are introduced.

Indexed as

attitude of health personneleHealthgeneral practitionerssurvey

Identifiers

PMID34880663
PMCPMC8646113
OpenAlexW3216419136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.