ArticleInfection and drug resistance2021
The Potential of Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction for Improving Diagnostic Yield of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Pulmonary Disease.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMany patients with nontuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary disease are asymptomatic. The disease diagnosis is confirmed in only a small proportion of patients with radiological findings suspicious for nontuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary disease. Thus, many patients remained undiagnosed. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic value of digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in nontuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary disease.
methodsWe prospectively evaluated 123 patients with radiological findings suspicious for nontuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary disease. Digital PCR was performed using bronchial lavage fluid, sputum, saliva, blood, and urine.
resultsThe culture of bronchial washing fluid was positive for nontuberculous mycobacteria in 53 patients and negative in 70. The positive detection rate of nontuberculous mycobacteria by digital PCR in patients with positive culture (n = 53) was as follows: bronchial lavage fluid 100%, sputum 62.9%, saliva 41.5%, blood 7.5%, and urine 3.8%. All patients with two or more positive partitions for nontuberculous mycobacteria in the digital PCR of bronchial lavage fluid showed nontuberculous mycobacteria growth in the bronchial lavage fluid culture. The digital PCR analysis of the bronchial lavage fluid showed a high sensitivity (100%), specificity (85.7%), positive predictive value (84.1%), negative predictive value (100%), and a high concordance rate (91.9%) with the bronchial lavage fluid culture results. In addition, the culture of bronchial lavage fluid was positive for nontuberculous mycobacteria in patients with two or more positive partitions in the digital PCR of sputum and saliva with a combined positive predictive value of 81.1%.
conclusionDigital PCR analysis of nontuberculous mycobacteria in bronchial lavage fluid shows a high concordance rate with the bronchial lavage fluid culture results and a high positive predictive value using both sputum and saliva, suggesting the potential usefulness of dPCR for diagnosis of nontuberculous mycobacteria pulmonary disease in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.