ArticleJournal of orthopaedics
Subcutaneous edema on back detected by MRI in hospitalized patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The link between lumbar subcutaneous edema and soft tissues composition in patients with low back pain: an observational study on MRI.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Observational
- Factors associated with new fractures in adjacent vertebrae after percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Application of bone alkaline phosphatase and 25-oxhydryl-vitamin D in diagnosis and prediction of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAlmost all hospitalized patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture are given an MRI. At that time, subcutaneous edema on their back is often identified. It is empirically known that patients with subcutaneous edema on their back have a history of compression fracture and vertebral kyphotic deformity. In this study, we examined whether there were any differences between patients who had subcutaneous edema on their back and those who did not; those with a history of compression fractures would be especially assessed. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe observation period was between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2020. All patients were on the ward, and there were a total of 375 patients (male: 114; female: 261) aged 66-98 years old (mean: 81.1 years).Patients who had subcutaneous edema on their back and those who did not were compared in terms of sex, age, osteoporosis diagnosis by DEXA and X-ray imaging, body mass index (BMI), serum total protein and albumin, Japanese senile independence score, presence of decubitus, history of vertebral compression fracture and incidents of compression fracture during the observation period.
resultsSignificant differences were not observed for sex, osteoporosis diagnosis by DEXA, BMI, blood serum total protein and albumin, or the presence of decubitus. However, age, osteoporosis diagnosis by X-ray imaging, Japanese senile independence score, history of vertebral compression fracture, and incidents of another vertebral compression fracture during the observation period were significantly different between those with and without edema.
conclusionIt has been suggested that hospitalized patients with subcutaneous edema on their back often have a history of vertebral compression fracture and experience another vertebral compression fracture during the observation period. Hospitalized patients with subcutaneous edema on their back should have their osteoporosis treated more carefully.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.