Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34880359›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2021

Prediction of hemodynamic tolerance of intermittent hemodialysis in critically ill patients: a cohort study.

Rogerio da Hora Passos, Juliana Ribeiro Caldas, Joao Gabriel Rosa Ramos, Erica Batista Dos Santos Galvão de Melo, Marcelo Augusto Duarte Silveira, Paulo Benigno Pena Batista

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07643597 (Volume Removal Intolerance During Net Ultrafiltration in Acute Kidney Injury Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07643597 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Volume Removal Intolerance During Net Ultrafiltration in Acute Kidney Injury Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Las HiguerasRan2026 to 2027Enrolled128ConditionsAcute Kidney Injury, Fluid Overload, Fluid Overload in Dialysis Patients, Critical Illness
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rogerio da Hora PassosCritical Care Unit Hospital São Rafael, Salvador, Brazil. oiregorpassos@yahoo.com.br.
Juliana Ribeiro CaldasCritical Care Unit Hospital São Rafael, Salvador, Brazil.
Joao Gabriel Rosa RamosCritical Care Unit Hospital São Rafael, Salvador, Brazil.
Erica Batista Dos Santos Galvão de MeloCritical Care Unit Hospital São Rafael, Salvador, Brazil.
Marcelo Augusto Duarte SilveiraCritical Care Unit Hospital São Rafael, Salvador, Brazil.
Paulo Benigno Pena BatistaCritical Care Unit Hospital São Rafael, Salvador, Brazil.
Hospital São Rafael · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation and management of fluid balance are key challenges when caring for critically ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of clinical judgment and other variables to predict the occurrence of hypotension during intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) in critically ill patients. This was a prospective, observational, single-center study involving critically ill patients undergoing IHD. The clinical judgment of hypervolemia was determined by the managing nephrologists and critical care physicians in charge of the patients on the basis of the clinical data used to calculate the ultrafiltration volume and rate for each dialysis treatment. Seventy-nine (31.9%) patients presented with hypotension during IHD. Patients were perceived as being hypervolemic in 109 (43.9%) of the cases by nephrologists and in 107 (43.1%) by intensivists. The agreement between nephrologists and intensivists was weak (kappa = 0.561). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis yielded an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.84; P < 0.0001), and a cutoff value of 70 mm for the vascular pedicle width (VPW) had the highest accuracy for the prediction of the absence of hypotension. The clinical judgment of hypervolemia did not predict hypotension during IHD. The high predictive ability of the VPW may assist clinicians with critical thinking.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessHemodynamicsBrazilHumansHypotensionProspective StudiesRenal Dialysis

Identifiers

PMID34880359
PMCPMC8655072
OpenAlexW4226070440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.