Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34880351›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Migratory chondroprogenitors retain superior intrinsic chondrogenic potential for regenerative cartilage repair as compared to human fibronectin derived chondroprogenitors.

Elizabeth Vinod, Noel Naveen Johnson, Sanjay Kumar, Soosai Manickam Amirtham, Jithu Varghese James, Abel Livingston, Grace Rebekah, Alfred Job Daniel, Boopalan Ramasamy, Solomon Sathishkumar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Elizabeth VinodDepartment of Physiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India. elsyclarence@cmcvellore.ac.in.
Noel Naveen JohnsonDepartment of Physiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Sanjay KumarCentre for Stem Cell Research, (A Unit of InStem, Bengaluru), Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Soosai Manickam AmirthamDepartment of Physiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Jithu Varghese JamesDepartment of Diabetes, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Abel LivingstonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, India.
Grace RebekahDepartment of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Alfred Job DanielDepartment of Orthopaedics, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, India.
Boopalan RamasamyDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia. jpboopy@gmail.com.
Solomon SathishkumarDepartment of Physiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India. solomon@cmcvellore.ac.in.
Christian Medical College & Hospital · INKing's College London · GBRoyal Adelaide Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-based therapy for articular hyaline cartilage regeneration predominantly involves the use of mesenchymal stem cells and chondrocytes. However, the regenerated repair tissue is suboptimal due to the formation of mixed hyaline and fibrocartilage, resulting in inferior long-term functional outcomes. Current preclinical research points towards the potential use of cartilage-derived chondroprogenitors as a viable option for cartilage healing. Fibronectin adhesion assay-derived chondroprogenitors (FAA-CP) and migratory chondroprogenitors (MCP) exhibit features suitable for neocartilage formation but are isolated using distinct protocols. In order to assess superiority between the two cell groups, this study was the first attempt to compare human FAA-CPs with MCPs in normoxic and hypoxic culture conditions, investigating their growth characteristics, surface marker profile and trilineage potency. Their chondrogenic potential was assessed using mRNA expression for markers of chondrogenesis and hypertrophy, glycosaminoglycan content (GAG), and histological staining. MCPs displayed lower levels of hypertrophy markers (RUNX2 and COL1A1), with normoxia-MCP exhibiting significantly higher levels of chondrogenic markers (Aggrecan and COL2A1/COL1A1 ratio), thus showing superior potential towards cartilage repair. Upon chondrogenic induction, normoxia-MCPs also showed significantly higher levels of GAG/DNA with stronger staining. Focused research using MCPs is required as they can be suitable contenders for the generation of hyaline-like repair tissue.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationChondrogenesisAdipogenesisBiomarkersCartilage, ArticularCell CycleCell DifferentiationCell MovementCells, CulturedChondrocytesFibronectinsFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMiddle AgedBiomarkersFibronectins

Identifiers

PMID34880351
PMCPMC8654938
OpenAlexW4200414669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.