Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34880318›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Maximizing gerrymandering through ising model optimization.

Yasuharu Okamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yasuharu OkamotoSystem Platform Research Laboratories, NEC Corporation, 1753 Shimonumabe, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8666, Japan. y-okamoto@aist.go.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By using the Ising model formulation for combinatorial optimization with 0-1 binary variables, we investigated the extent to which partisan gerrymandering is possible from a random but even distribution of supporters. Assuming that an electoral district consists of square subareas and that each subarea shares at least one edge with other subareas in the district, it was possible to find the most tilted assignment of seats in most cases. However, in cases where supporters' distribution included many enclaves, the maximum tilted assignment was usually found to fail. We also discussed the proposed algorithm is applicable to other fields such as the redistribution of delivery destinations.

Identifiers

PMID34880318
PMCPMC8655093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.