Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34880296›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Decoding accelerometry for classification and prediction of critically ill patients with severe brain injury.

Shubhayu Bhattacharyay, John Rattray, Matthew Wang, Peter H Dziedzic, Eusebia Calvillo, Han B Kim, Eshan Joshi, Pawel Kudela, Ralph Etienne-Cummings, Robert D Stevens

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shubhayu BhattacharyayLaboratory of Computational Intensive Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. sb2406@cam.ac.uk.
John RattrayDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Matthew WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Peter H DziedzicLaboratory of Computational Intensive Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Eusebia CalvilloDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Han B KimLaboratory of Computational Intensive Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Eshan JoshiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Pawel KudelaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ralph Etienne-CummingsDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Robert D StevensLaboratory of Computational Intensive Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our goal is to explore quantitative motor features in critically ill patients with severe brain injury (SBI). We hypothesized that computational decoding of these features would yield information on underlying neurological states and outcomes. Using wearable microsensors placed on all extremities, we recorded a median 24.1 (IQR: 22.8-25.1) hours of high-frequency accelerometry data per patient from a prospective cohort (n = 69) admitted to the ICU with SBI. Models were trained using time-, frequency-, and wavelet-domain features and levels of responsiveness and outcome as labels. The two primary tasks were detection of levels of responsiveness, assessed by motor sub-score of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCSm), and prediction of functional outcome at discharge, measured with the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE). Detection models achieved significant (AUC: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.53-0.85]) and consistent (observation windows: 12 min-9 h) discrimination of SBI patients capable of purposeful movement (GCSm > 4). Prediction models accurately discriminated patients of upper moderate disability or better (GOSE > 5) with 2-6 h of observation (AUC: 0.82 [95% CI: 0.75-0.90]). Results suggest that time series analysis of motor activity yields clinically relevant insights on underlying functional states and short-term outcomes in patients with SBI.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessAccelerometryAgedBrain InjuriesFemaleGlasgow Outcome ScaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID34880296
PMCPMC8654973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.