ArticleScientific reports2021
Repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative cervical strain elastography (E-Cervix) in pregnancy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gravitational 3D Magnetic Resonance Elastography for Differentiating Focal Nodular Hyperplasia and Hepatic Adenoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Lack of Association Between Middle Cerebral Artery Diastolic Deceleration Area and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Case-Control Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Characterization of Cervical Remodeling During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period: A Case Series Analysis.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- Multivariate analysis of determinants and development of a predictive algorithm for successful labor induction in nulliparous women.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Reproducibility of quantitative cervical strain elastography in nonpregnant patients and the effect of vaginal misoprostol on measured parameters.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Role of Cervical Elastography in Predicting Progression to Active Phase in Labor Induction in Term Nulliparous Women.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cervical elastography at 18 to 23 weeks to predict spontaneous preterm birth in individuals with a history of preterm birth.AJOG global reports · 2025Article
- The Emerging Role of Sonoelastography in Pregnancy: Applications in Assessing Maternal and Fetal Health.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Recommendations for strain elastography of the uterine cervix.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Review
- Repeatability and Reproducibility of Potential Ultrasonographic Bishop Score Parameters.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Advances in the clinical application of ultrasound elastography in uterine imaging.Insights into imaging · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Strain elastography of the uterine cervix may be useful in the diagnosis and prediction of obstetric complications. The inability to obtain quantitative results, with only the possibility of visual semiquantitative evaluation of the obtained elastograms, has been the limitation of the method thus far. E-Cervix is a software program that uses intrinsic compression to excite tissue and allows the evaluation of quantitative parameters on the basis of pixel distribution in an elastogram. The aim of this study was to assess the repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative cervical strain elastography (E-Cervix) of the uterine cervix and to assess the correlation of the obtained parameters with selected clinical features of patients in the third trimester of pregnancy. In total, 222 patients participated in the study. We assessed 5 ultrasound parameters: elasticity index (ECI), hardness ratio (HR), internal os strain (IOS), external os strain (EOS) and IOS/EOS ratio. Each study was performed according to a predetermined standardized protocol. For all assessed elastographic parameters, we obtained good intra- and interobserver reproducibility. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranged from 0.77 to 0.838 for intraobserver variability and from 0.771 to 0.826 for interobserver variability. We demonstrated a significant correlation of some obtained elastographic parameters with the basic clinical features of patients, such as age, the number of previous caesarean sections, pregnancy weight and BMI. In each case, the correlation was very low. Quantitative elastographic assessment with the use of E-Cervix is characterized by good repeatability. Some clinical features may affect the value of the parameters obtained. The clinical relevance of this interference requires further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.