Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34880263›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative cervical strain elastography (E-Cervix) in pregnancy.

Jakub Mlodawski, Marta Mlodawska, Justyna Plusajska, Karolina Detka, Agata Michalska, Grzegorz Swiercz, Marek Sikorski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Recommendations for strain elastography of the uterine cervix.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jakub MlodawskiCollegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Kielce, Poland. jakub.mlodawski@ujk.edu.pl.
Marta MlodawskaCollegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Kielce, Poland.
Justyna PlusajskaCollegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Kielce, Poland.
Karolina DetkaClinic of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Provincial Combined Hospital in Kielce, Kielce, Poland.
Agata MichalskaCollegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Kielce, Poland.
Grzegorz SwierczCollegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Kielce, Poland.
Marek SikorskiCollegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Kielce, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strain elastography of the uterine cervix may be useful in the diagnosis and prediction of obstetric complications. The inability to obtain quantitative results, with only the possibility of visual semiquantitative evaluation of the obtained elastograms, has been the limitation of the method thus far. E-Cervix is a software program that uses intrinsic compression to excite tissue and allows the evaluation of quantitative parameters on the basis of pixel distribution in an elastogram. The aim of this study was to assess the repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative cervical strain elastography (E-Cervix) of the uterine cervix and to assess the correlation of the obtained parameters with selected clinical features of patients in the third trimester of pregnancy. In total, 222 patients participated in the study. We assessed 5 ultrasound parameters: elasticity index (ECI), hardness ratio (HR), internal os strain (IOS), external os strain (EOS) and IOS/EOS ratio. Each study was performed according to a predetermined standardized protocol. For all assessed elastographic parameters, we obtained good intra- and interobserver reproducibility. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranged from 0.77 to 0.838 for intraobserver variability and from 0.771 to 0.826 for interobserver variability. We demonstrated a significant correlation of some obtained elastographic parameters with the basic clinical features of patients, such as age, the number of previous caesarean sections, pregnancy weight and BMI. In each case, the correlation was very low. Quantitative elastographic assessment with the use of E-Cervix is characterized by good repeatability. Some clinical features may affect the value of the parameters obtained. The clinical relevance of this interference requires further investigation.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesAdultCervix UteriElasticityFemaleHumansObserver VariationPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, ThirdReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonography, Prenatal

Identifiers

PMID34880263
PMCPMC8655038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.