Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34880208›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2021

Neurocognition and social cognition in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders with and without a history of violence: results of a multinational European study.

Laura Iozzino, Philip D Harvey, Nicola Canessa, Pawel Gosek, Janusz Heitzman, Ambra Macis, Marco Picchioni, Hans Joachim Salize, Johannes Wancata, Marlene Koch and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. [Dynamic Prediction of Recidivism in Violence in Community-Based Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder Patients: A Joint Model].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Laura IozzinoUnit of Epidemiological Psychiatry and Evaluation, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3633-8316
Philip D HarveyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences; Research Service, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Nicola CanessaScuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, IUSS Cognitive Neuroscience (ICoN) Center, Pavia, Italy.
Pawel GosekDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland.
Janusz HeitzmanDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland.
Ambra MacisUnit of Statistics, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Marco PicchioniDepartment of Forensic and Neurodevelopmental Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Hans Joachim SalizeMedical Faculty Mannheim/Heidelberg University, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Johannes WancataClinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Marlene KochClinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Clarissa Ferrari *Unit of Statistics, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Giovanni de Girolamo *Unit of Epidemiological Psychiatry and Evaluation, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy. gdegirolamo@fatebenefratelli.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1611-8324
Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli · ITInstitute of Psychiatry and Neurology · PLMedical University of Vienna · ATHeidelberg University · DEIstituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia · ITKing's College London · GBUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNeurocognitive impairment has been extensively studied in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and seems to be one of the major determinants of functional outcome in this clinical population. Data exploring the link between neuropsychological deficits and the risk of violence in schizophrenia has been more inconsistent. In this study, we analyse the differential predictive potential of neurocognition and social cognition to discriminate patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders with and without a history of severe violence.

methodsOverall, 398 (221 cases and 177 controls) patients were recruited in forensic and general psychiatric settings across five European countries and assessed using a standardized battery.

resultsEducation and processing speed were the strongest discriminators between forensic and non-forensic patients, followed by emotion recognition. In particular, increased accuracy for anger recognition was the most distinctive feature of the forensic group.

conclusionsThese results may have important clinical implications, suggesting potential enhancements of the assessment and treatment of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders with a history of violence, who may benefit from consideration of socio-cognitive skills commonly neglected in ordinary clinical practice.

Indexed as

SchizophreniaCognitionHumansNeuropsychological TestsSchizophrenic PsychologySocial CognitionViolence

Identifiers

PMID34880208
PMCPMC8651972
OpenAlexW4200496266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.