Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34880095›Full record

ArticleNeurology2022

In Vivo Reflectance Microscopy of Meissner Corpuscles and Bedside Measures of Large Fiber Sensory Function: A Normative Data Cohort.

Peter D Creigh, Khai Du, Elizabeth P Wood, Joan Mountain, Janet Sowden, Julie Charles, Steffen Behrens-Spraggins, David N Herrmann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter D CreighFrom the Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY. peter_creigh@urmc.rochester.edu.
Khai DuFrom the Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY. peter_creigh@urmc.rochester.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0874-7072
Elizabeth P WoodFrom the Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY.
Joan MountainFrom the Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY.
Janet SowdenFrom the Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY.
Julie CharlesFrom the Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY.
Steffen Behrens-SpragginsFrom the Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY.
David N HerrmannFrom the Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, NY.
University of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe goal of this work was to establish age-, sex-, and body dimension-adjusted normal cutoff values for Meissner corpuscle (MC) densities via in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), timed vibration sensory thresholds with a 128-Hz tuning fork, and touch-pressure sensory thresholds with standardized monofilaments for clinical and research application.

methodsSeventy-seven prospectively recruited individuals without signs or symptoms of peripheral neuropathy or a condition or neurotoxin exposure that can alter sensory function underwent cross-sectional evaluation of MC densities via in vivo RCM, monofilament touch-pressure sensory thresholds, and timed vibration sensory thresholds in nondominant upper and lower extremities. Age-, sex-, and body dimension (e.g., height)-adjusted normal values were developed. The fifth percentile for MC densities and timed vibration thresholds and 95th percentile for MF touch-pressure thresholds were selected as normal cutoff points.

resultsParticipants were 9 to 89 years of age. Age and sex were uniformly distributed. Timed vibration and touch-pressure thresholds were less sensitive with increasing age and were more sensitive in the hand than in the leg or foot within individuals. Timed vibration thresholds did not differ by sex or body dimensions. Touch-pressure thresholds were lower (more sensitive) at the thenar eminence and digit V in the hand in women compared to men but otherwise did not differ by sex at other measurement locations. Body dimensions did not affect touch-pressure thresholds. There were no apparent age-related floor effects for the 5th and 95th percentile normal cutoff values for timed vibration or touch-pressure thresholds, respectively. MC densities also declined with age and were highest at digit V and lowest at the arch within individuals. MC densities were affected by sex or body dimensions at all imaging sites, with lower densities seen in male participants or larger individuals. MC densities were quantifiable in the hand of all participants and were associated with touch-pressure thresholds at all locations. DISCUSSION: This study establishes age-, sex-, and body dimension-adjusted normal cutoff values for 2 easily applied measures of large fiber sensory function and RCM assessment of MC densities for multiple limb locations. These results will aid in the detection and monitoring of peripheral sensory nerve disorders.

Indexed as

MechanoreceptorsTouchCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalSensory ThresholdsVibration

Identifiers

PMID34880095
PMCPMC8865896
OpenAlexW4200232861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.