Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34880020›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Study protocol: the OxWell school survey investigating social, emotional and behavioural factors associated with mental health and well-being.

Karen Laura Mansfield, Stephen Puntis, Emma Soneson, Andrea Cipriani, Galit Geulayov, Mina Fazel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Are Adolescents Sensitive About Sensitive Data? Exploring Student Concerns About Privacy, Confidentiality, and Data Use in Health Research.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Karen Laura MansfieldDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK karen.mansfield@psych.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0342-7926
Stephen PuntisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4397-2435
Emma SonesonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1666-3012
Andrea CiprianiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5179-8321
Galit GeulayovDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mina FazelDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9342-2365

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImproving our understanding of the broad range of social, emotional and behavioural factors that contribute to mental health outcomes in adolescents will be greatly enhanced with diverse, representative population samples. We present a protocol for a repeated self-report survey assessing risk and protective factors for mental health and well-being in school pupils aged 8-18 years with different socioeconomic backgrounds in England. The survey will provide a comprehensive picture of mental health and associated risks at the community level to inform the development of primary and secondary prevention and treatment strategies in schools. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol is for a large-scale online repeated self-report survey, representative of children and adolescents aged 8-18 years attending schools or further education colleges in participating counties in England. The survey consists of around 300 questions, including validated measures of mental health and well-being, risk and protective factors, and care-seeking behaviour and preferences. Additional questions each year vary to address current events and novel hypotheses, developed by the research team, collaborators and stakeholders. Primary analyses will investigate current and changing risk and protective factors, care-seeking behaviour and attitudes to allowing linkage of their sensitive data to other databases for research, and will compare measures of mental health to measures of well-being. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the University of Oxford Research Ethics Committee (Reference: R62366). Tailored data summaries will be provided to participating schools and stakeholders within 3 months of data collection. The main findings will be presented at scientific meetings, published in peer-reviewed journals and shared via digital and social media channels. At the end of the study, other researchers will be able to apply for access to anonymous data extracts.

Indexed as

Mental HealthSchoolsAdolescentChildEmotionsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitieschild & adolescent psychiatryepidemiologymental health

Identifiers

PMID34880020
PMCPMC9066348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.