Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34879873›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2021

A pilot feasibility study of Exercising Together© during radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a dyadic approach for patients and spouses.

Kerri M Winters-Stone, Karen S Lyons, Tomasz M Beer, Meghan B Skiba, Arthur Hung

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03418025 (Exercising Together), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03418025 nacompletednot on this map

Exercising Together: An Intervention for Couples Coping With Prostate Cancer During Radiation Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorOHSU Knight Cancer InstituteRan2017 to 2018Enrolled24ConditionsDomestic Partnership, Prostate Carcinoma, SpouseArmsExercise Intervention, Questionnaire Administration, Survey Administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Preliminary effects of a yoga intervention for lung cancer dyads: benefits for care partners.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cardio-oncology rehabilitation: are we ready?European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kerri M Winters-StoneKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. wintersk@ohsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1706-8020
Karen S LyonsConnell School of Nursing, Boston College, Boston, MA, USA.
Tomasz M BeerKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Meghan B SkibaKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Arthur HungKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · USBoston College · US

Funding

Understanding the origins of rapid recurrence of pancreatic cancer after resectionP30CA069533 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Luiz Eduardo Bertassoni · 1997 to 2026
$60.5M
Exploring the concept of dyadic health in Thai couples coping with breast cancer: A preliminary study of a partnered approach to physical activity in breast cancer survivors and spouse care partnersR01CA218093 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI WINTERS-STONE, KERRI M · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA069533NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218093NIH HHS 1R01CA218093oregon health and science university n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProstate cancer can negatively impact the health of patients and their spouse, particularly early on in the cancer trajectory. PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility and acceptability of dyadic exercises during radiation therapy and preliminary efficacy on physical, mental, and relational outcomes for men and their spouses. Exercising Together©, originally designed as a 6-month dyadic resistance training program for couples post-treatment, was adapted for the radiation setting.

methodsWe conducted a single-group pilot feasibility study of Exercising Together© in men scheduled for radiation therapy for prostate cancer and their spouse. Couples attended supervised exercise sessions thrice weekly throughout radiation treatment and were followed up 8 weeks later. Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability with secondary outcomes of changes in physical (physical functioning (short physical performance battery (sPPB)), gait speed (m/s), functional capacity (400-m walk (min), physical activity (min/week)), mental (depressive symptoms (CES-D), and anxiety (SCL-90 ANX)), and relationship (Dyadic Coping, Role Overload, and Physical Intimacy Behavior Scales) health outcomes for each partner. Participants completed an evaluation post-intervention.

resultsTen couples enrolled and 8 completed the intervention, attending 83% of scheduled sessions. Couple satisfaction with the intervention was high (patients: mean difference (MD) = 9.4 ± 1.9 and spouses: MD = 10.0 ± 0.0, on a 1-10 scale). At post-intervention, gait speed (MD = 0.1; 95%CI: 0.1, 0.2; p = 0.003; d = 0.94) and functional capacity (MD = -0.6; 95%CI: -0.9, 0.3; p = 0.002; d = -0.42) improved in patients and sPPB in spouses (MD = 1.3; 95%CI: 0.3, 2.2; p = 0.02; d = 0.71). Total physical activity increased non-significantly for patients and significantly for spouses at post-intervention and decreased at follow-up (MD = 179.6; 95%CI: 55.4, 303.7; p = 0.01; d = 1.35 and MD = -139.9; 95%CI: -266.5, 13.3; p = 0.03; d=1.06). Among patients, anxiety and active engagement significantly improved post-intervention (MD = -2.3; 95%CI: -3.8, 0.7; p = 0.01; d = -0.43 and MD = 2.5; 95%CI: 0.7, 4.3; p = 0.01; d = 0.98, respectively). There were modest effects on other physical, mental, and relationship health domains in patients and spouses.

conclusionA modified version of Exercising Together© is a feasible and acceptable program during radiation therapy for prostate cancer and shows preliminary evidence for improvements on physical, mental, and relational health in both patient and spouse. A larger, fully powered randomized controlled trial is warranted and could help shift the landscape toward dyadically targeted interventions.

trial registrationThis study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov on February 18th, 2018 ( NCT03418025 ).

Indexed as

CaregiverDyadExerciseMental healthPhysical activityPhysical functionProstate cancerRelationship

Identifiers

PMID34879873
PMCPMC8653603
OpenAlexW4226085533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.