ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021
Optimal dimensionality selection for independent component analysis of transcriptomic data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- iModulonMiner 2.0: multi-modality modularization of prokaryotic bulk, single-cell, and community omics data.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Article
- Identifying clinically relevant cell state interactions in the tumor microenvironment of IDH-mutant gliomas using CSI-TME.Molecular systems biology · 2026Article
- Revealing transcriptomic responses inmSystems · 2026Article
- Dissecting host stress responses for predictable heterologous gene expression in E. coli.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Multimodal bioinformatic analyses of genome-scale expression beyond gene-centric differential expression.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- The transcriptional regulatory network of the Escherichia coli MG1655 reference strain.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Unraveling proteomic chaos by independent component analysis-ClpX proficiency promotes the iron and oxygen limitation responses ofmSystems · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Models for Cancer Research: A Narrative Review of Bulk RNA-Seq Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Transcriptional regulatory networks of the human gut symbiont Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron are uncovered using machine learning.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Laboratory Evolution Reveals Transcriptional Mechanisms Underlying Thermal Adaptation of Escherichia coli.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
- Revealing systematic changes in the transcriptome during the transition from exponential growth to stationary phase.mSystems · 2025Article
- Deciphering the proteome ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Machine-Learning Analysis of Streptomyces coelicolor Transcriptomes Reveals a Transcription Regulatory Network Encompassing Biosynthetic Gene Clusters.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- iModulonMiner and PyModulon: Software for unsupervised mining of gene expression compendia.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Machine learning reveals the transcriptional regulatory network and circadian dynamics ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Article
- Machine learning analysis of RB-TnSeq fitness data predicts functional gene modules inmSystems · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndependent component analysis is an unsupervised machine learning algorithm that separates a set of mixed signals into a set of statistically independent source signals. Applied to high-quality gene expression datasets, independent component analysis effectively reveals both the source signals of the transcriptome as co-regulated gene sets, and the activity levels of the underlying regulators across diverse experimental conditions. Two major variables that affect the final gene sets are the diversity of the expression profiles contained in the underlying data, and the user-defined number of independent components, or dimensionality, to compute. Availability of high-quality transcriptomic datasets has grown exponentially as high-throughput technologies have advanced; however, optimal dimensionality selection remains an open question.
methodsWe computed independent components across a range of dimensionalities for four gene expression datasets with varying dimensions (both in terms of number of genes and number of samples). We computed the correlation between independent components across different dimensionalities to understand how the overall structure evolves as the number of user-defined components increases. We then measured how well the resulting gene clusters reflected known regulatory mechanisms, and developed a set of metrics to assess the accuracy of the decomposition at a given dimension.
resultsWe found that over-decomposition results in many independent components dominated by a single gene, whereas under-decomposition results in independent components that poorly capture the known regulatory structure. From these results, we developed a new method, called OptICA, for finding the optimal dimensionality that controls for both over- and under-decomposition. Specifically, OptICA selects the highest dimension that produces a low number of components that are dominated by a single gene. We show that OptICA outperforms two previously proposed methods for selecting the number of independent components across four transcriptomic databases of varying sizes.
conclusionsOptICA avoids both over-decomposition and under-decomposition of transcriptomic datasets resulting in the best representation of the organism's underlying transcriptional regulatory network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.