Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34879815›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

Optimal dimensionality selection for independent component analysis of transcriptomic data.

John Luke McConn, Cameron R Lamoureux, Saugat Poudel, Bernhard O Palsson, Anand V Sastry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Deciphering the proteome ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Machine learning reveals the transcriptional regulatory network and circadian dynamics ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John Luke McConnUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, USA.
Cameron R LamoureuxUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, USA.
Saugat PoudelUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, USA.
Bernhard O PalssonUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, USA.
Anand V SastryUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, USA. avsastry@eng.ucsd.edu.

Funding

Systems Biology Approach to Redefine Susceptibility Testing and Treatment of MDR Pathogens in the Context of Host ImmunityU01AI124316 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PALSSON, BERNHARD O · 2016 to 2020
$10.2M
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases U01AI124316NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI124316Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF10CC1016517
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndependent component analysis is an unsupervised machine learning algorithm that separates a set of mixed signals into a set of statistically independent source signals. Applied to high-quality gene expression datasets, independent component analysis effectively reveals both the source signals of the transcriptome as co-regulated gene sets, and the activity levels of the underlying regulators across diverse experimental conditions. Two major variables that affect the final gene sets are the diversity of the expression profiles contained in the underlying data, and the user-defined number of independent components, or dimensionality, to compute. Availability of high-quality transcriptomic datasets has grown exponentially as high-throughput technologies have advanced; however, optimal dimensionality selection remains an open question.

methodsWe computed independent components across a range of dimensionalities for four gene expression datasets with varying dimensions (both in terms of number of genes and number of samples). We computed the correlation between independent components across different dimensionalities to understand how the overall structure evolves as the number of user-defined components increases. We then measured how well the resulting gene clusters reflected known regulatory mechanisms, and developed a set of metrics to assess the accuracy of the decomposition at a given dimension.

resultsWe found that over-decomposition results in many independent components dominated by a single gene, whereas under-decomposition results in independent components that poorly capture the known regulatory structure. From these results, we developed a new method, called OptICA, for finding the optimal dimensionality that controls for both over- and under-decomposition. Specifically, OptICA selects the highest dimension that produces a low number of components that are dominated by a single gene. We show that OptICA outperforms two previously proposed methods for selecting the number of independent components across four transcriptomic databases of varying sizes.

conclusionsOptICA avoids both over-decomposition and under-decomposition of transcriptomic datasets resulting in the best representation of the organism's underlying transcriptional regulatory network.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksTranscriptomeAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualGene Expression Profiling

Identifiers

PMID34879815
PMCPMC8653613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.