Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34879478›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of emergency medicine2021

A new predictor for indicating clinical severity and prognosis in COVID-19 patients: Frontal QRS-T angle.

Metin Ocak, Mustafa Begenc Tascanov, Nur Şimşek Yurt, Yusuf Can Yurt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Ferritin/lymphocyte percentage ratio to predict the severity and mortality of COVID-19.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2023
    Article
  4. Predictive efficacy of frontal QRS-T angle in COVID-19 patients.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2022
    Article
  5. Is frontal QRS-T angle a valid predictor of COVID-19 severity?The American journal of emergency medicine · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Metin OcakGazı State Hospital, Emergency Clinic Samsun, Turkey. Electronic address: mdmocak@gmail.com.
Mustafa Begenc TascanovDepartment of Cardiology, Harran University Faculty of Medicine, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
Nur Şimşek YurtSamsun Training And Research Hospital, Family Medicine Clinic, Turkey.
Yusuf Can YurtGazı State Hospital, Emergency Clinic Samsun, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCOVID-19; It spread rapidly around the world and led to a global pandemic. Indicators of poor prognosis are important in the treatment and follow-up of COVID-19 patients and have always been a matter of interest to researchers. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between frontal QRS-T angle values and clinical severity and prognosis in COVID-19 patients.

methodsThis prospective case-control study was conducted with 130 COVID-19 patients whose diagnosis was confirmed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and 100 healthy controls. The CURB-65 score was used as the clinical severity score.

resultsA total of 130 patients and 100 healthy controls were included in the study. When the patient and control groups were compared a significant difference was found between QT (378.07 ± 33.75 vs. 368.63 ± 19.65, p < 0.001), QTc (410.79 ± 28.19 vs. 403.68 ± 11.70, p < 0.001), QRS time (95.04 ± 21.67 vs. 91.42 ± 11.08, p < 0.001) and frontal QRS-T angle (36.57 ± 22.86 vs. 22.72 ± 14.08, p < 0.001). According to clinical severity scoring, QT (370.27 ± 25.20 vs. 387.75 ± 40.19, p = 0.003), QTc (402.18 ± 19.92 vs. 421.48 ± 33.08, p < 0.001), frontal QRS-T angle (32.25 ± 18.79 vs. 41.94 ± 26.27), p = 0.0.16) parameters were found to be significantly different. Age (odds ratio [OR], 1.201; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.111-1.298; p < 0.001) and frontal QRS-T angle ([OR], 1.045; 95% [CI], 1.015-1.075; p = 0.003) values were found to be an independent predictor for the severity of the disease. Frontal QRS-T angle ([OR], 1.101; 95% [CI], 1.030-1.176; p = 0.004), and CRP ([OR], 1.029; 95% [CI], 1.007-1.051; p = 0.01) parameters were found to be independent predictors for the mortality of the disease. As a mortality indicator; for the frontal QRS-T angle of ≥44.5°, specificity and sensitivity were 93.8% and 84.2%, respectively.

conclusionFrontal QRS-T angle can be used as a reproducible, convenient, inexpensive, new and powerful predictor in determining the clinical severity and prognosis of COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSeverity of Illness IndexCOVID-19Frontal QRS-T angleMortalityQTQTcVentricular arrhythmia

Identifiers

PMID34879478
PMCPMC8457916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.