Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34879252›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2022

tDCS modulates effective connectivity during motor command following; a potential therapeutic target for disorders of consciousness.

Davide Aloi, Roya Jalali, Penelope Tilsley, R Chris Miall, Davinia Fernández-Espejo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of neuromodulation and rehabilitation approaches on pain relief in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Davide AloiSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Roya JalaliSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Penelope TilsleySchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRMBM, UMR 7339, Marseille, France.
R Chris MiallSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Davinia Fernández-EspejoSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: d.fernandez-espejo@bham.ac.uk.
University of Birmingham · GBCentre de Résonance Magnétique Biologique et Médicale · FR

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P02596X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is attracting increasing interest as a potential therapeutic route for unresponsive patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDOC). However, research to date has had mixed results. Here, we propose a new direction by directly addressing the mechanisms underlying lack of responsiveness in PDOC, and using these to define our targets and the success of our intervention in the healthy brain first. We report 2 experiments that assess whether tDCS to the primary motor cortex (M1-tDCS; Experiment 1) and the cerebellum (cb-tDCS; Experiment 2) administered at rest modulate thalamo-cortical coupling in a subsequent command following task typically used to clinically assess awareness. Both experiments use sham- and polarity-controlled, randomised, double-blind, crossover designs. In Experiment 1, 22 participants received anodal, cathodal, and sham M1-tDCS sessions while in the MRI scanner. A further 22 participants received the same protocol with cb-tDCS in Experiment 2. We used Dynamic Causal Modelling of fMRI to characterise the effects of tDCS on brain activity and dynamics during simple thumb movements in response to command. We found that M1-tDCS increased thalamic excitation and that Cathodal cb-tDCS increased excitatory coupling from thalamus to M1. All these changes were polarity specific. Combined, our experiments demonstrate that tDCS can successfully modulate long range thalamo-cortical dynamics during command following via targeting of cortical regions. This suggests that M1- and cb-tDCS may allow PDOC patients to overcome the motor deficits at the root of their reduced responsiveness, improving their rehabilitation options and quality of life as a result.

Indexed as

AdultBrainBrain MappingCerebellumConsciousness DisordersDouble-Blind MethodElectric StimulationEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotor CortexNeural PathwaysQuality of LifeTranscranial Direct Current Stimulationconnectivity, motor networkconsciousnessfMRIPDOCtDCS

Identifiers

PMID34879252
PMCPMC8803542
OpenAlexW4220937618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.