Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34879206›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2022

Effort, success, and side of lesion determine arm choice in individuals with chronic stroke.

Sujin Kim, Cheol E Han, Bokkyu Kim, Carolee J Winstein, Nicolas Schweighofer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Autonomy support encourages use of more-affected arm post-stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sujin KimDivision of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-5222-4538
Cheol E HanDepartment of Electronics and Information Engineering, Korea University, Sejong, Republic of Korea.
Bokkyu KimDivision of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0003-4245-373X
Carolee J WinsteinDivision of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0001-9789-4626
Nicolas SchweighoferDivision of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0003-3362-6088
University of Southern California · USKorea University · KR

Funding

Optimizing the Dose of Rehabilitation After StrokeR01HD065438 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SCHWEIGHOFER, NICOLAS, WINSTEIN, CAROLEE J · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
Optimizing sensori-motor training post-strokeR56NS100528 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SCHWEIGHOFER, NICOLAS · 2017 to 2017
$483k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD065438NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS100528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In neurotypical individuals, arm choice in reaching movements depends on expected biomechanical effort, expected success, and a handedness bias. Following a stroke, does arm choice change to account for the decreased motor performance, or does it follow a preinjury habitual preference pattern? Participants with mild-to-moderate chronic stroke who were right-handed before stroke performed reaching movements in both spontaneous and forced-choice blocks, under no-time, medium-time, and fast-time constraint conditions designed to modulate reaching success. Mixed-effects logistic regression models of arm choice revealed that expected effort predicted choices. However, expected success only strongly predicted choice in left-hemiparetic individuals. In addition, reaction times decreased in left-hemiparetic individuals between the no-time and the fast-time constraint conditions but showed no changes in right-hemiparetic individuals. Finally, arm choice in the no-time constraint condition correlated with a clinical measure of spontaneous arm use for right-, but not for left-hemiparetic individuals. Our results are consistent with the view that right-hemiparetic individuals show a habitual pattern of arm choice for reaching movements relatively independent of failures. In contrast, left-hemiparetic individuals appear to choose their paretic left arm more optimally: that is, if a movement with the paretic arm is predicted to be not successful in the upcoming movement, the nonparetic right arm is chosen instead.

Indexed as

AgedArmChoice BehaviorChronic DiseaseFemaleFunctional LateralityHabitsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityParesisStrokearm choicechronic strokehabitsreachingvalue-based models of choice

Identifiers

PMID34879206
PMCPMC8782657
OpenAlexW4200081903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.