ArticlePloS one2021
Consumer perceptions of antimicrobial use in animal husbandry: A scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insights into Non-Antibiotic Alternative and Emerging Control Strategies for Chicken Coccidiosis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Systematic mapping of threats to U.S. beef production.Translational animal science · 2026Review
- Consumer Perspectives on Antibiotic-Free Animal Products: A Systematic Review Identifying Critical Gaps in Non-Pharmaceutical Intervention Research.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Antibiotics and Opportunities of Their Alternatives in Pig Production: Mechanisms Through Modulating Intestinal Microbiota on Intestinal Health and Growth.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Consumers' perspectives on antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance in food animals: a systematic review.NPJ science of food · 2025Article
- Comparison of a novel bovine respiratory disease prediction technology and an automated animal disease detection technology to traditional methods in a U.S. feedlot.Translational animal science · 2025Article
- Understanding Consumers' Purchase Intention Towards Meat Produced Without Preventive Antibiotic Use.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Assessing antimicrobial resistance in pasture-based dairy farms: a 15-month surveillance study in New Zealand.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- Assessing the difference in contamination of retail meat with multidrug-resistant bacteria using for-consumer package label claims that indicate on-farm antibiotic use practices- United States, 2016-2019.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2024Article
- Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Impacts of access to legume- or grass-based pasture on behaviour, physiological responses and bacterial load of laying hens.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Attitudes of South Korean consumers toward the prudent use of antimicrobials in livestock animals.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- Variation in Pen-Level Prevalence of BRD Bacterial Pathogens and Antimicrobial Resistance Following Feedlot Arrival in Beef Calves.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effects of coated sodium butyrate on the growth performance, serum biochemistry, antioxidant capacity, intestinal morphology, and intestinal microbiota of broiler chickens.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- The effect of a One Health message intervention on willingness to pay for antibiotic-free animal foods: A randomized controlled trial among Chinese college students.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Consumer Preferences and Attitudes towards Antibiotic Use in Food Animals.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Effect of fenugreek seeds andFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Udder Health Monitoring for Prevention of Bovine Mastitis and Improvement of Milk Quality.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Towards a Better Use of Antimicrobials on Farms: Insights from a Participatory Approach in the French Pig and Poultry Sectors.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Correction: Consumer perceptions of antimicrobial use in animal husbandry: A scoping review.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial use in animal agriculture is often perceived to play a role in the emerging threat of antimicrobial resistance. Increased consumer awareness of this issue places pressure on animal husbandry to adopt policies to reduce or eliminate antimicrobial use. We use a scoping review methodology to assess research on consumer perceptions of antimicrobial drugs in meat products in the United States, Canada, or the European Union. Evaluating peer-reviewed and grey literature, we included studies for assessment if they met these topical and geographic requirements, involved primary data collection, and were originally published in English. Our screening process identified 124 relevant studies. Three reviewers jointly developed a data charting form and independently charted the contents of the studies. Of the 105 studies that measured consumer concern, 77.1% found that consumers were concerned about antimicrobial use in meat production. A minority of studies (29.8% of all studies) queried why consumers hold these views. These studies found human health and animal welfare were the main reasons for concern. Antimicrobial resistance rarely registered as an explicit reason for concern. A smaller group of studies (23.3%) measured the personal characteristics of consumers that expressed concern about antimicrobials. Among these studies, the most common and consistent features of these consumers were gender, age, income, and education. Regarding the methodology used, studies tended to be dominated by either willingness-to-pay studies or Likert scale questionnaires (73.64% of all studies). We recommend consideration of qualitative research into consumer views on this topic, which may provide new perspectives that explain consumer decision-making and mentality that are lacking in the literature. In addition, more research into the difference between what consumers claim is of concern and their ultimate purchasing decisions would be especially valuable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.