Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34879086›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

A network-based method for predicting disease-associated enhancers.

Duc-Hau Le

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. PCBP2 Regulates p16Aging cell · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Duc-Hau LeSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Thuyloi University, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-4951-5916

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnhancers regulate transcription of target genes, causing a change in expression level. Thus, the aberrant activity of enhancers can lead to diseases. To date, a large number of enhancers have been identified, yet a small portion of them have been found to be associated with diseases. This raises a pressing need to develop computational methods to predict associations between diseases and enhancers.

resultsIn this study, we assumed that enhancers sharing target genes could be associated with similar diseases to predict the association. Thus, we built an enhancer functional interaction network by connecting enhancers significantly sharing target genes, then developed a network diffusion method RWDisEnh, based on a random walk with restart algorithm, on networks of diseases and enhancers to globally measure the degree of the association between diseases and enhancers. RWDisEnh performed best when the disease similarities are integrated with the enhancer functional interaction network by known disease-enhancer associations in the form of a heterogeneous network of diseases and enhancers. It was also superior to another network diffusion method, i.e., PageRank with Priors, and a neighborhood-based one, i.e., MaxLink, which simply chooses the closest neighbors of known disease-associated enhancers. Finally, we showed that RWDisEnh could predict novel enhancers, which are either directly or indirectly associated with diseases.

conclusionsTaken together, RWDisEnh could be a potential method for predicting disease-enhancer associations.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDiseaseGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansNeural Networks, ComputerTranscription, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID34879086
PMCPMC8654176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.