Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34878999›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2022

Patient Satisfaction and Recommendations for Delivering a Group-Based Intensive Outpatient Program via Telemental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Cohort Study.

Michelle K Skime, Ajeng J Puspitasari, Melanie T Gentry, Dagoberto Heredia, Craig N Sawchuk, Wendy R Moore, Monica J Taylor-Desir, Kathryn M Schak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michelle K SkimeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7863-3017
Ajeng J PuspitasariDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8552-7498
Melanie T GentryDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9484-3206
Dagoberto HerediaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6725-836X
Craig N SawchukDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6293-953X
Wendy R MooreDepartment of Nursing, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9857-797X
Monica J Taylor-DesirDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3542-0190
Kathryn M SchakDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4726-3380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough group-based intensive outpatient programs (IOPs) are a level of care commonly utilized by adults with serious mental illness, few studies have examined the acceptability of group-based IOPs that required rapid transition to a telemental health (TMH) format during the COVID-19 pandemic.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and future recommendations for a group-based IOP that was transitioned to a TMH format during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA 17-item patient satisfaction questionnaire was completed by patients at discharge and covered 3 areas: IOP TMH satisfaction, future recommendations, and video technology challenges. Descriptive and content analyses were conducted for the quantitative and open-ended questions, respectively.

resultsA total of 76 patients completed the program in 2020. A subset of patients (n=40, 53%) responded to the survey at program discharge. The results indicated that the patients were satisfied overall with the TMH program format; 50% (n=20) of the patients preferred the program continue offering the TMH format, and the rest preferred returning to in-person formats after the pandemic. The patients indicated the elements of the program that they found most valuable and provided recommendations for future program improvement.

conclusionsOverall, adults with serious mental illness reported high satisfaction with the group-based IOP delivered via TMH. Health care systems may want to consider offering both TMH and in-person formats regardless of the state of the pandemic. Patients' feedback on future improvements should be considered to help ensure long-term success.

Indexed as

COVID-19intensive outpatientpatient satisfactiontelemedicinetelemental healthtelepsychiatryteletherapy

Identifiers

PMID34878999
PMCPMC8797152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.