Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34878986›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Early Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Experience With the Use of Telehealth to Address Disparities: Scoping Review.

James E Bailey, Cathy Gurgol, Eric Pan, Shirilyn Njie, Susan Emmett, Justin Gatwood, Lynne Gauthier, Lisa G Rosas, Shannon M Kearney, Samantha Kleindienst Robler and 5 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Global prevalence and risk factors of obstetric violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Characterizing Populations Based on Proximity to a Fragile X Syndrome Specialty Clinic.American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

James E Bailey *Tennessee Population Health Consortium, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9662-3338
Cathy GurgolPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4665-6649
Eric PanWestat Inc, Center for Healthcare Delivery Research and Evaluation, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2797-7212
Shirilyn NjieWestat Inc, Center for Healthcare Delivery Research and Evaluation, Rockville, MD, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3754-6499
Susan EmmettDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4257-8161
Justin GatwoodCollege of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4801-8555
Lynne GauthierDepartment of Physical Therapy and Kinesiology, Zuckerberg College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0619-2157
Lisa G RosasDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4053-7972
Shannon M KearneySolution Insights & Validation, Highmark Health, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8355-0267
Samantha Kleindienst RoblerNorton Sound Health Corporation, Nome, AK, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8768-8084
Raymona H LawrenceCommunity Health Behavior and Education, Jiann-Ping College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6554-3354
Karen L MargolisHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1862-7402
Ifeyinwa OsunkwoCancer Care, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9368-2247
Denise WilfleyDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, MO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3599-8689
Vallabh O ShahDepartment of Internal Medicine and Biochemistry, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3584-4057

Funding

Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth systems and providers across America are increasingly employing telehealth technologies to better serve medically underserved low-income, minority, and rural populations at the highest risk for health disparities. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) has invested US $386 million in comparative effectiveness research in telehealth, yet little is known about the key early lessons garnered from this research regarding the best practices in using telehealth to address disparities.

objectiveThis paper describes preliminary lessons from the body of research using study findings and case studies drawn from PCORI seminal patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) initiatives. The primary purpose was to identify common barriers and facilitators to implementing telehealth technologies in populations at risk for disparities.

methodsA systematic scoping review of telehealth studies addressing disparities was performed. It was guided by the Arksey and O'Malley Scoping Review Framework and focused on PCORI's active portfolio of telehealth studies and key PCOR identified by study investigators. We drew on this broad literature using illustrative examples from early PCOR experience and published literature to assess barriers and facilitators to implementing telehealth in populations at risk for disparities, using the active implementation framework to extract data. Major themes regarding how telehealth interventions can overcome barriers to telehealth adoption and implementation were identified through this review using an iterative Delphi process to achieve consensus among the PCORI investigators participating in the study.

resultsPCORI has funded 89 comparative effectiveness studies in telehealth, of which 41 assessed the use of telehealth to improve outcomes for populations at risk for health disparities. These 41 studies employed various overlapping modalities including mobile devices (29/41, 71%), web-based interventions (30/41, 73%), real-time videoconferencing (15/41, 37%), remote patient monitoring (8/41, 20%), and store-and-forward (ie, asynchronous electronic transmission) interventions (4/41, 10%). The studies targeted one or more of PCORI's priority populations, including racial and ethnic minorities (31/41, 41%), people living in rural areas, and those with low income/low socioeconomic status, low health literacy, or disabilities. Major themes identified across these studies included the importance of patient-centered design, cultural tailoring of telehealth solutions, delivering telehealth through trusted intermediaries, partnering with payers to expand telehealth reimbursement, and ensuring confidential sharing of private information.

conclusionsEarly PCOR evidence suggests that the most effective health system- and provider-level telehealth implementation solutions to address disparities employ patient-centered and culturally tailored telehealth solutions whose development is actively guided by the patients themselves to meet the needs of specific communities and populations. Further, this evidence shows that the best practices in telehealth implementation include delivery of telehealth through trusted intermediaries, close partnership with payers to facilitate reimbursement and sustainability, and safeguards to ensure patient-guided confidential sharing of personal health information.

Indexed as

Ethnic and Racial MinoritiesTelemedicineComparative Effectiveness ResearchHumansPatient Outcome AssessmentPovertydisparitiesimplementation sciencescoping reviewtelehealth

Identifiers

PMID34878986
PMCPMC8693194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.