Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34878576›Full record

ReviewHerz2022

[Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis : A position statement of the ESC working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases 2021].

Sabine Pankuweit, Rolf Dörr

Erratum issuedAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herz, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sabine PankuweitKlinik für Innere Medizin - Kardiologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Baldinger Str. 1, 35043, Marburg, Deutschland. pankuwei@staff.uni-marburg.de.
Rolf DörrPraxisklinik Herz und Gefäße, Kardiologie • Angiologie • Radiologie • Nuklearmedizin, Akademische Lehrpraxisklinik, TU Dresden, Forststr. 3, 01099, Dresden, Deutschland.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac amyloidosis is still considered a rare disease, although recent data show that it is the cause of cardiac dysfunction more frequently than expected. The diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis is based on the detection of extracellular deposits of misfolded proteins in the myocardium. This detection can be made invasively or noninvasively and is based on a tentative diagnosis that forms the foundation for further diagnostic measures. As different forms of amyloidosis may have different clinical presentations, suspicion of amyloidosis is often difficult. As not only the diagnostic possibilities have become broader but also new therapeutic possibilities have been tested in clinical studies, the working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has set up a working group of experts to compile the current data on the clinical presentation, diagnostics and treatment of patients with cardiac amyloidosis, in order to subsequently develop diagnostic criteria and treatment options for patients with different forms of cardiac amyloidosis by consensus. The aim was to formulate a uniform Europe-wide acceptable concept for essential diagnostics and treatment for this group of patients. Only this will create the foundation for national and international registers and double-blind randomized treatment studies.

Indexed as

AmyloidosisCardiologyCardiomyopathiesHeart DiseasesHumansMyocardiumRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCardiac amyloidosisCardiac dysfunctionDiagnosticsMyocardiumTreatment

Identifiers

PMID34878576
OpenAlexW4200436717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.