Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34878550›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Patients With Stroke Presenting With Low Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score in the Early and Extended Window.

Eyad Almallouhi, Sami Al Kasab, Zachary Hubbard, Eric C Bass, Guilherme Porto, Ali Alawieh, Reda Chalhoub, Pascal M Jabbour, Robert M Starke, Stacey Q Wolfe and 27 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Delayed treatment of severe stroke: room for thrombectomy?European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors at 20 institutions in 8 countries.

Eyad AlmallouhiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Sami Al KasabDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Zachary HubbardDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Eric C BassDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Guilherme PortoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Ali AlawiehDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Reda ChalhoubDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Pascal M JabbourDepartment of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Robert M StarkeDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida.
Stacey Q WolfeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Adam S ArthurDepartment of Neurosurgery, Semmes-Murphey Neurologic and Spine Clinic, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis.
Edgar SamaniegoDepartment of Neurology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City.
Ilko MaierDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Brian M HowardDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ansaar RaiDepartment of Radiology, West Virginia School of Medicine, Morgantown.
Min S ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Justin MascitelliDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio.
Marios PsychogiosDepartment of Radiology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Reade De LeacyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York.
Travis DumontDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona, Tuscon.
Michael R LevittDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle.
Adam PolifkaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Joshua OsbunDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.
Roberto CrosaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Endovascular Neurological Center, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Joon-Tae KimDepartment of Neurology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.
Walter CasagrandeDepartment of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery, Hospital Juan Fernandez, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Shinichi YoshimuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
Charles MatoukDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Peter T KanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.
Richard W WilliamsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Benjamin GoryDepartment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy, Nancy, France.
Maxim MokinDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida, Tampa.
Isabel FragataNeuroradiology Department, Hospital São José Centro Hospitalar, Lisboa, Portugal.
Osama ZaidatNeuroscience Department, Bon Secours Mercy Health St Vincent Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio.
Albert J YooDepartment of Radiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Dallas-Fort Worth.
Alejandro M SpiottaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) Collaborators
Medical University of South Carolina · USEmory University · USUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · USAllegheny Health Network · USCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRChonnam National University Hospital · KRHospital de São José · PTHospital Fernández · ARHyogo Medical University · JPMount Sinai Health System · USNeurological Surgery · USSt Vincent Medical Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USThomas Jefferson University Hospital · USUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Miami Health System · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Limited data are available about the outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for real-world patients with stroke presenting with a large core infarct. Objective: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of MT for patients with large vessel occlusion and an Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) of 2 to 5. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR), which combines the prospectively maintained databases of 28 thrombectomy-capable stroke centers in the US, Europe, and Asia. The study included 2345 patients presenting with an occlusion in the internal carotid artery or M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. Patients were followed up for 90 days after intervention. The ASPECTS is a 10-point scoring system based on the extent of early ischemic changes on the baseline noncontrasted computed tomography scan, with a score of 10 indicating normal and a score of 0 indicating ischemic changes in all of the regions included in the score. Exposure: All patients underwent MT in one of the included centers. Main Outcomes and Measures: A multivariable regression model was used to assess factors associated with a favorable 90-day outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2), including interaction terms between an ASPECTS of 2 to 5 and receiving MT in the extended window (6-24 hours from symptom onset). Results: A total of 2345 patients who underwent MT were included (1175 women [50.1%]; median age, 72 years [IQR, 60-80 years]; 2132 patients [90.9%] had an ASPECTS of ≥6, and 213 patients [9.1%] had an ASPECTS of 2-5). At 90 days, 47 of the 213 patients (22.1%) with an ASPECTS of 2 to 5 had a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 (25.6% [45 of 176] of patients who underwent successful recanalization [modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia score ≥2B] vs 5.4% [2 of 37] of patients who underwent unsuccessful recanalization; P = .007). Having a low ASPECTS (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.85; P = .002) and presenting in the extended window (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55-0.88; P = .001) were associated with worse 90-day outcome after controlling for potential confounders, without significant interaction between these 2 factors (P = .64). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, more than 1 in 5 patients presenting with an ASPECTS of 2 to 5 achieved 90-day functional independence after MT. A favorable outcome was nearly 5 times more likely for patients with low ASPECTS who had successful recanalization. The association of a low ASPECTS with 90-day outcomes did not differ for patients presenting in the early vs extended MT window.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAsiaBrain IschemiaCarotid Artery, InternalCohort StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentStrokeThrombectomyTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID34878550
PMCPMC8655598
OpenAlexW4200191522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.